From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Jan 19 2009 - 12:44:49 ARST
Last time I checked throwbacks are still in!
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 2:06 AM, Scott Morris
<smorris@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> hehhehe Do you really think that people did NOT mention the concept of
> keeping the old one? :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Darby Weaver [mailto:ccie.weaver@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 9:47 PM
> To: Scott Morris
> Cc: Marko Milivojevic; swm@emanon.com; Scott M Vermillion; Yandy Ramirez;
> Andrew Larkins; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: New CCIE logo
>
>
>
> Hey if you really dislike the logo...
>
>
>
> Do not download it. If some 20,000 people refuse to acknowledge its
> legitimacy then it will not last very long.
>
>
>
> To be fair to Cisco they did offer a survey offering at least two type of
> logos. Maybe someone should have recommended keeping the old one.
>
>
>
> However, since there are so many tracks now this will serve to benifit those
> wil specialty tracks and multiple CCIE's the most.
>
>
>
> And it will likely affect the majoroty of CCIE's in the other direction,
> since a little bit of the halo "one logo fits all" aspect may be diminished
> a bit. Kind of like being just an MCSE versus being an MCSE+Security or
> MCSE+Messaging back in the day or a CNE versus a Master CNE, etc.
>
>
>
> Don't feel bad employers are already asking for a CCNA or a CCIE to fill
> positions with. Now the logos for everyone will make this even more likely
> since the logos kind of look alike. How's HR to know the difference, who
> keeps track of these things anyway?
>
>
>
>
>
> On 1/18/09, Scott Morris <smorris@internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>
> They likely are. Or someone will forward it on. Whether it makes a
> difference or not is another story.
>
> Or whether it gets forwarded high enough up the chain, I'm not sure. There
> are a lot of things that can be changed in the world with grassroots
> movements... perhaps this could be one of them? :)
>
> Scott
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: markom@gmail.com [mailto:markom@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Marko
> Milivojevic
> Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 7:01 PM
> To: swm@emanon.com
> Cc: Scott Morris; Scott M Vermillion; Yandy Ramirez; Andrew Larkins;
> ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: New CCIE logo
>
> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 23:47, Scott Morris <swm@emanon.com> wrote:
>> Just promise me you won't open up a cert support ticket about it! :)
>
> Ah, you see! That's a bloody good idea! If I do that, the whole new
> thing may collapse and they may be forced to roll back.
>
> Btw. new logos, suck on so many levels. Did you notice that there is
> no vector version any longer? We're stuck with 3 sizes, which look
> disgusting at best when printed out. Not to mention that there is no
> official B&W version.
>
> What a sloppy work, I can't believe it. What the hell is wrong with
> what once was the greatest certification program? Sure, I hold some
> grudge about failing CCDE, but really, this is nonsense.
>
> And yeah, I hope they are reading.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:39 ARST