From: Anthony Sequeira (asequeira@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Jan 18 2009 - 00:55:13 ARST
Without testing - my guess is this...
When you configure shut as the action - the low-level parameter has no
function. If the storm control high-level is triggered the port is
error-disabled as you pointed out. I have never seen an IOS feature
that error-disables a port and then undoes that on its own. Again, as
you pointed out - we typically need error disable recovery to automate
that.
As you know - from a lab perspective - we configure exactly what they
ask for...even if the task writer did not think through how the
feature actually works. :-)
Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626, CCSI #23251
Senior CCIE Instructor
asequeira@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
On Jan 17, 2009, at 8:53 PM, John Edom wrote:
> Hi Group,
>
> still waiting.........
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 9:23 AM, John Edom <jedom123@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Experts,
>>
>> If i configure storm-control like
>>
>> storm-control unicast level 90 70
>> storm-control action shut
>>
>> Now if storm reach 90 % port will be shutdown because of specified
>> action
>> but when flood come down below 70, will port come up back. I think
>> this
>> lower value is configured for default behavior that is block
>> traffic so i
>> have to configure errdisable with it but please correct me .
>>
>> Regards
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST