From: Anthony Sequeira (asequeira@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2009 - 16:36:37 ARST
I think Marko was just trying to get you to talk more about IP
Precedence and the DSCP compatibility with it.
Simply saying one uses three bits and the other uses six is not really
enough.
Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626, CCSI #23251
Senior CCIE Instructor
asequeira@internetworkexpert.com
Internetwork Expert, Inc.
http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344
On Jan 17, 2009, at 1:23 PM, TCP IP4 wrote:
> I can understand DSCP is back compatible with IPP with the extension
> of the 3 more bits. Where are the incompatibility of IPP with DSCP?
> Can you please share any links? Thanks a lot!
>
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 1:40 AM, Marko Milivojevic
> <markom@markom.info> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 03:26, TCP IP4 <tcp.ip4@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> First come out is 3 bits vs 6 bits. Do I need to drill more?
>>
>> Let's continue on the same note :-)
>>
>> How does that help you, especially when combined with other
>> technologies that still use only 3 bits? Can you name those
>> technologies and explain their compatibility or incompatibility with
>> DSCP?
>>
>> --
>> Marko
>> CCIE #18427 (SP)
>> My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST