From: Johnnie Utah (johnnieutah1@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Jan 14 2009 - 18:44:34 ARST
Do what is asked of you, nothing more - even if you ask for clarity,
you may get your question answered with a question, i.e. "does it say
you aren't allowed to do x,y, and z?". As Walter Matthau said in the
original Bad News Bears, "Never assume - that way you don't make an
ass out of you and me" ASS|U|ME.
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 7:48 AM, Rik Guyler <rik@guyler.net> wrote:
> Be careful of what you say here. Some of this sounds like it might be close
> to an NDA violation. If this isn't actual lab content then no worries.
>
> You will not be penalized for adding in additional configuration unless it
> is either expressly forbidden or changes the nature of the functionality in
> a way that does not satisfy the requirements. From the previous posts on
> this topic, the general consensus is that you should *not* put in
> additional, unnecessary code if it is not needed. You have to always keep
> in mind that the lab does not really ever mimic a real-world network so you
> have to throw best practice right out the window and just fulfill the
> requirements. Nothing more, nothing less.
>
> Rik
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Alexandre Oliveira
> Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 5:59 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: CCIE score criteria
>
> All,
>
> Last week I had an unfortunate score of my Lab examination and I was
> wondering how the Proctors evaluate our answers (or at least an idea).
>
> The Exam is quite clear about what is needed to accomplish each task, but as
> far as I know, each one can be done in our way (if there are some).
> I was thinking about some questions:
>
> - that BGP session they requested, I've used some commands for ALL routers,
> like "no bgp default route-target filter, no bgp def ipv4 unicast," is this
> forbidden?
> - the peers I created had: "send-community (for ipv4), next-hop-self (for
> ALL eBGP)" is this considered an error?
>
>
> I could see some instructions clear, like: "no other router should have
> VPNV4 session against ASxx but R7", where it shows precisely what is allowed
> and what is not, but those "best practice commands" (at my point of view)
> shouldn't be disallowed, or should they be?
>
> Well, if someone have some tips related to this and to "what should I be
> worried in my next (and please Lord LAST) attempt, e-mail me.
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
> Alexandre.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sun Mar 01 2009 - 09:43:38 ARST