From: Ron Lim (gottobeccie@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Dec 28 2008 - 01:55:51 ARST
Hi Scott,
Thanks a lot for the reference!
Regards,
Ron
On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Scott M Vermillion <
scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> wrote:
> Hi Ron,
>
> Yes, it's the case that the classes are evaluated sequentially from top
> down. Do you have the QoS Exam Cert Guide? In the second edition, you can
> have a look at page 151, where the last full para states "...IOS applies
> the
> policy map classes in the order that they appear in the 'policy-map'
> command." If you don't have that book (you should), do you have the 3rd
> edition of the R&S Exam Cert Guide? There, on page 423, you can have a
> look
> at the "Key Topic," where a case of a mis-ordered policy-map is discussed
> (the more specific case of NetMeet is entered following a generic match for
> voice and thus the NetMeet class is theoretically never hit (in spite of
> the
> example 'sh policy-map' text suggesting otherwise)).
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Ron
> Lim
> Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 5:23 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: MQC - Read in Top Down manner?
>
> Hi Experts,
>
> Does MQC read from topdown?
>
> Example:
>
> policy-map PM
> class CLASS2
> set ip precedence 1
> class CLASS1
> set ip precedence 2
>
> MQC will try to match CLASS2 then CLASS1?
>
> My gut feeling is yes but I can't find proof with Cisco documentation for
> it.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Ron
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:10 ARST