From: Ronnie Angello (ronnie.angello@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 18 2008 - 15:12:41 ARST
The first next hop IP listed will be used unless it's unreachable. If
you are trying to achieve load sharing, then I believe that you need
to use set ip next-hop recursive. That way a recursive lookup is done
on the next hop that's not directly connected, and assuming that you
have multiple equal cost paths, CEF will load share over them.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 11:34 AM, <subodh.rawat@wipro.com> wrote:
> If we set multiple next-hop IP addresses in route-map while configuring
> PBR, what is the behaviour?
>
>
>
> For example:
>
>
>
> Route-map test
>
> Match ip address 101
>
> Set ip next-hop 1.1.1.1 2.2.2.2 3.3.3.3
>
>
>
> Interface f0/0
>
> Ip policy route-map test
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Subodh
>
>
> Please do not print this email unless it is absolutely necessary.
>
> The
> information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this
> message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain
> proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this
> e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this
> message and any attachments.
>
> WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted
> via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
> presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by
> any virus transmitted by this email.
>
> www.wipro.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Ronald Angello CCIE #17846Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:09 ARST