From: Scott Morris (smorris@internetworkexpert.com)
Date: Sun Dec 14 2008 - 00:14:58 ARST
Next hop failure would not give a best path. You have to be the best path
to be handed to the routing table to begin with. Only after being handed to
the routing table can the route be rejected so you have a RIB failure. ;)
So it's a good route in BGP. But the routing table has a better AD path.
Try "show ip route x.x.a.a" and see what shows up!
Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
Senior CCIE Instructor
smorris@internetworkexpert.com
Knowledge is power.
Power corrupts.
Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
olumayokun fowowe
Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2008 4:53 AM
To: Cisco certification; Narbik Kocharians
Subject: Re: RIB failure in BGP
Hello Joshua,
The next hop addresses are reachable and I have tried using the
next-hop-self command on the route-reflector(i.e A)
'Mayokun
On 12/13/08, olumayokun fowowe <olumayokun@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello Guys,
>
> I have a question here. RouterA is peering with RouterB and RouterC
> with RouterA being the route-reflector. I have advertised the
> loopbacks( /32) on my A and B routers to bgp with the network command
> but I keep having them with rib failure in my bgp table (
> r>ix.x.a.a/32
>
>
> r>ix.x.b.b/32
>
> Please, what is the likely cause of this and how do I resolve the
> situation?
>
> Thanks all,
>
> 'Mayokun.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST