From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Dec 13 2008 - 16:40:02 ARST
Seems like it should be delta. Does the solution explain why they picked
absolute?
On 12/13/08, Scott M Vermillion <scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> wrote:
>
> Without seeing the exact task language, I hesitate - but it sure sounds
> like
> a mistake. With delta, it's just as you say (change over time). An
> absolute value would be something that floats within a range (i.e. the
> value
> can increase and it can also decrease, such as CPU utilization, etc).
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Modular
> Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:06 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: RMON delta or absolute...
>
> Experts....
>
> So I'm working on a practice Lab and I'm asked to configure an RMON alarm
> that monitors a MIB variable on an interface. The alarm should be triggered
> when there
> "is an increase of 100 or more of the MIB variable".
>
>
>
> So I'm thinking . when there's an increase . as in, it increased 100 or
> more
> since the last time I checked.
>
>
>
> Well in the proctor guide they use the "absolute" option, not the delta
> option. Is this a mistake or do I not fully understand what the
> absolute/delta keywords do in the rmon alarm command?
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mod .
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST