From: antonygrooves (antonygrooves@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Dec 11 2008 - 18:22:32 ARST
Do you still recommend to double map in frame relay between two routers,
not a hub and spoke network. Only R1 ---- R2
Thanks again.
Tony.
Pierre-Alex Guanel wrote:
> Yes, sure the maping at the Global level is needed for hub / spoke L3
> reacheability , but not for IPv6 RIP....
>
> PA
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Rick Mur <rick@rickmur.com
> <mailto:rick@rickmur.com>> wrote:
>
> It's enough to only map the link-local in this case, although for
> my feeling
> I configure also a mapping to the global address. I guess it's just a
> feeling, but link-local is enough :)
>
>
> Rick Mur
> CCIE #21946 (R&S)
> CCNP, CCIP, JNCIA-ER, MCSE
> rick@rickmur.com <mailto:rick@rickmur.com>
>
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 18:59:13 -0200
> antonygrooves <antonygrooves@gmail.com
> <mailto:antonygrooves@gmail.com>> wrote:
> Hi Guys.
>
> I have a doubt regarding RIP IPV6 over Frame realy.
> If its necessary to do the frame relay map for the link local and
> link global, Like in OSPFV3 or just to the link local.
>
> In both cases y can see the routes behind the frame relay cloud,
> thats why im little confused.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Tony.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST