From: Administrator (Administrator@Subfighter.ca)
Date: Wed Dec 10 2008 - 23:02:49 ARST
Excellent, this is excatly what I needed. Thanks Huan, this made things a lot
more clear. I guess before I ask, I should check Internetwork Experts site.
They are the one stop shop for everything. I wonder if they will ever open up
a Home Depot !!
Internetwork Expert --> The Swiss Army Knife of CCIE Candidates
________________________________
From: Huan Pham [mailto:pnhuan@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wed 12/10/2008 12:52 PM
To: Administrator
Cc: Cisco certification
Subject: Re: ACL or Prefix list with Distribute list
- Using distribute-list with standard ACL and Prefix-list should be straight
forward!
- Using distribute-list with extended ACL is a bit tricky, as different
routing protocols may interpret the exended ACL in different ways. This use is
very poorly docummented in DOC CD. Maybe, because this use is a legacy one,
and not recommended anymore.
There's a good blog entry by Brian M. (from IE) on this topic at the following
URL:
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/01/04/using-extended-access-lists-in-
a-distribute-list/
--- On Thu, 12/11/08, Administrator <Administrator@Subfighter.ca> wrote:
From: Administrator <Administrator@Subfighter.ca>
Subject: ACL or Prefix list with Distribute list
To:
Cc: "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Date: Thursday, December 11, 2008, 4:15 AM
When using a distribute list, can you or can you not use a prefix list or an
ACL ?
I seem to have limited success when using one of the above options with a
distribute list. But then I think that I may have made a mistake.
So I just want to post out here for clarity...
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
_______________________________________________________________________
Subscription information may be found at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST