Re: Multicast testing "not RPF interface"

From: L. Jankok (ljankok@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 10 2008 - 13:27:31 ARST


Hi guys,

Here is the show ip mroute from R6 before the ping to 228.28.28.28

 Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode
(*, 224.0.1.40), 03:52:57/00:02:19, RP 150.1.2.2, flags: SJPCL
  Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/0.26, RPF nbr 132.1.26.2
  Outgoing interface list: Null

And after the ping to 228.28.28.28

 Interface state: Interface, Next-Hop or VCD, State/Mode
(*, 228.28.28.28), 00:00:07/stopped, RP 150.1.2.2, flags: SP
  Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/0.26, RPF nbr 132.1.26.2
  Outgoing interface list: Null

(150.1.6.6, 228.28.28.28), 00:00:07/00:02:52, flags: PT
  Incoming interface: Null, RPF nbr 0.0.0.0
  Outgoing interface list: Null

(*, 224.0.1.40), 03:55:05/00:02:13, RP 150.1.2.2, flags: SJPCL
  Incoming interface: FastEthernet0/0.26, RPF nbr 132.1.26.2
  Outgoing interface list: Null

Here is the show ip pim neighbor on RSRack1R6

Neighbor Interface Uptime/Expires Ver DR
Address Prio/Mode
132.1.26.2 FastEthernet0/0.26 05:32:17/00:01:23 v2 1 / S

And here the show ip pim interface on RSRack1R6

Address Interface Ver/ Nbr Query DR DR
                                          Mode Count Intvl Prior
132.1.26.6 FastEthernet0/0.26 v2/S 1 30 1
132.1.26.6
132.1.6.6 FastEthernet0/0.6 v2/S 0 30 1
132.1.6.6

Regards,

Lucio

2008/12/10 Jason Madsen <madsen.jason@gmail.com>

> can you do a "show ip pim neighbor" and "show ip pim interf" too?
>
> Jason
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 6:27 AM, Rick Mur <rick@rickmur.com> wrote:
>
>> Could you also post your 'show ip mroute' from R6 and the configuration on
>> R6. I assume you configured the static RP address?
>>
>> Why it sends out on both interfaces is not really clear to me, but it
>> shouldn't be a problem, because at least one of the packets gets send out
>> well. You don't need a mroute here, but somehow it seems that your
>> multicast
>> routing table is not really as it's supposed to.
>>
>>
>> Rick Mur
>> CCIE #21946 (R&S)
>> CCNP, CCIP, JNCIA-ER, MCSE
>> rick@rickmur.com
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 10 Dec 2008 13:59:53 +0100
>> "L. Jankok" <ljankok@gmail.com> wrote:
>> RSRack1R6 is configured with two subinterfaces, f0/0.6 is stub and
>> f0/0.26
>> is connected to the rest of the network.
>> A neighbor is found through f0/0.26
>> Address
>> Prio/Mode
>> 132.1.26.2 FastEthernet0/0.26 02:42:43/00:01:36 v2 1
>> / S
>> pinging the group 228.28.28.28 from this neighbor, RSRack1R2, is
>> successfull
>> RSRack1R2#ping 228.28.28.28
>> Reply to request 0 from 132.1.17.7, 100 ms
>> pinging the same group sourced from subinterface f0/0.06 or f0/.26,
>> from R6
>> fails
>> each time displaying a message stating that the other sub interface
>> is
>> "not RPF interface"
>> RSRack1R6#ping 228.28.28.28 source f0/0.6
>> Packet sent with a source address of 132.1.6.6
>> *Oct 24 13:18:22.065: IP(0): s=132.1.6.6 (FastEthernet0/0.6)
>> d=228.28.28.28id=159, ttl=254, prot=1, len=114(100), mroute olist
>> null
>> *Oct 24 13:18:22.069: IP(0): s=132.1.6.6 (FastEthernet0/0.26)
>> d=228.28.28.28id=159, ttl=254, prot=1, len=114(100), not RPF
>> interface.
>> RSRack1R6#ping 228.28.28.28 source f0/0.26
>> Packet sent with a source address of 132.1.26.6
>> *Oct 24 13:35:53.641: IP(0): s=132.1.26.6 (FastEthernet0/0.6)
>> d=228.28.28.28id=161, ttl=254, prot=1, len=114(100), not RPF
>> interface
>> *Oct 24 13:35:53.645: IP(0): s=132.1.26.6 (FastEthernet0/0.26) d=
>> 228.28.28.28 id=161, ttl=254, prot=1, len=114(100), mroute olist
>> null.
>> your help is appreciated
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST