BSR RP

From: Ed Man (networkexpert08@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Dec 10 2008 - 12:47:36 ARST

Next message: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: Passed"
Previous message: Jason Madsen: "Re: Multicast testing "not RPF interface""
Next in thread: Marko Milivojevic: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Marko Milivojevic: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Rick Mur: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Ed Man: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Rick Mur: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Rick Mur: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Ed Man: "Re: BSR RP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group,

R7#sho ip pim rp map in-use
PIM Group-to-RP Mappings

Group(s) 224.0.0.0/4
  RP 10.224.1.2 (?), v2
    Info source: 10.224.1.2 (?), via bootstrap, priority 0, holdtime 150
         Uptime: 01:16:14, expires: 00:02:07
  RP 10.224.1.1 (?), v2
    Info source: 10.224.1.2 (?), via bootstrap, priority 0, holdtime 150
         Uptime: 01:17:52, expires: 00:02:11

Dynamic (Auto-RP or BSR) RPs in cache that are in use:
Group(s): 224.0.0.0/4, *RP: 10.224.1.2*, expires: 00:00:55

Don't know why the RP is 10.224.1.2 but not 10.224.1.1?
Some book said the smallest candidate RP address makes the tie-break.

Could you please give me some clues?

Thanks.
Ed

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Next message: Alexei Monastyrnyi: "Re: Passed"
Previous message: Jason Madsen: "Re: Multicast testing "not RPF interface""
Next in thread: Marko Milivojevic: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Marko Milivojevic: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Rick Mur: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Ed Man: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Rick Mur: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Rick Mur: "Re: BSR RP"
Maybe reply: Ed Man: "Re: BSR RP"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Thu Jan 01 2009 - 12:53:08 ARST