From: Jason Madsen (madsen.jason@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Nov 30 2008 - 22:31:09 ARST
Hi Moh,
I don't believe "rate-limit" will provide "guaranteed" bandwidth as does
"bandwidth" used in MQC. I guess another alternative to using MQC for this
purpose could be legacy custom queuing.
Jason
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Mohamed Tandou <dtandou@gmail.com> wrote:
> GS,
>
> let say i want to allocate 3k bandwidth to telnet traffic
> i want to use MQC my answer will be.
>
> class-map match-all TELNET
> match protocol telnet or i can access-group if i don't want to use NBAR
>
> policy-map QOS
> class TELNET
> bandwidth 3000
>
> If i don't want to use MQC, using rate limit or traffic shape rate will be
> ok?
>
> Thanks
>
> Moh
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:32 ARST