From: Darby Weaver (ccie.weaver@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 28 2008 - 15:10:53 ARST
I'd vote for changing the subnet mask a little or using a private range for
the address.
As of now you have an interesting situation.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 11:10 PM, Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com> wrote:
> NAT was created for this, then you would create a new subnet and translate
> port numbers of IP address from an old subnet, to port 23 on the new
> addresses.
> But you would be much better off changing you addressing.
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 6:56 AM, <cciedavito@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > have a situation were I've got 13 switches and ip addresses assigned
> for
> > managment vlan
> > and now I've been asked to add 6 additional switches, i have only two
> > host IP
> > addresses available to assign to my switches
> > is their any way I can work around this issue so that I can have all
> > switches
> > on the same subnet for the managment vlan.
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> ----------------
> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
> your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:32 ARST