Re: OT: IPv6 address assignments

From: sheherezada@gmail.com
Date: Fri Nov 28 2008 - 13:16:22 ARST


It was a more general question, but thanks for the link. Few years
ago people predicted a much faster transition to IPv6, which I just
did not see from my side of the world. The graph shows a spectacular
increase indeed, but it's still a thousand times less than regular
IPv4. So the question still remains - for a moment I thought that
something happened and I left behind.

Mihai

On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you referring to the following link?
> http://www.ams-ix.net/technical/stats/sflow/?type=ipv6
>
> There was a very surprising growth of v6 traffic at AMS IX this year.
> The last graph shows year-to-year growth of 2000 percent.
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 11:15 AM, <sheherezada@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am just wondering if you started to see organizations moving to IPv6
>> or Internet service providers assigning IPv6 only, especially in
>> Europe. I live in Eastern Europe - I know only one education
>> organization that has a working IPv6 network.
>>
>> Another thing is that Vista has IPv6 turned on by default on
>> non-domain computers. Have you heard of attacks that target the
>> Vista's automatic tunneling capabilities?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Mihai Dumitru
>> CCIE2 #16616
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> ----------------
> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
> your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:32 ARST