From: Pete Yeargin (pyeargin) (pyeargin@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Nov 20 2008 - 03:29:50 ARST
Unsubscribe ccielab
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
ccie-lab
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:04 PM
To: Huan Pham; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: QOS-Fast Enet Port
Huan, thanks for the info.
Can I use the shape average to give priority to voice?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Huan Pham" <Huan.Pham@peopletelecom.com.au>
To: "ccie-lab" <ccie.lab@verizon.net>; <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:39 PM
Subject: RE: QOS-Fast Enet Port
> No, it will not work.
>
> The bandwidth command only set the reference bandwidth used by some
QoS
> mechanism or routing protocol. It will not be used to limit
throughput.
>
> The best option for you is to use shaping instead.
>
>
> policy-map SHAPE
> class class-default
> shape average 768000
> !
> interface FastEthernet0/1
> ! Desc to WAN
> ! set reference bandwidth to reflect the correct bandwidth, not
required
> bandwidth 768
> ! Shapping is required
> service-policy output SHAPE
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
Of
> ccie-lab
> Sent: Thursday, 20 November 2008 2:15 PM
> To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: QOS-Fast Enet Port
>
> I have a Fast Ethernet port connected to a internal wan with 768K
> available.
> Can I control 768K worth of bandwidth on the FE port by setting the
> bandwidth to 768?
> Will this work?
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:31 ARST