From: Haroon (itguy.pro@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 19 2008 - 14:25:16 ARST
Thanks Frog and Seonghui!
So, 2811 is good for anything 10megs and below?
Does every router with public interface have to have firewall behind it or
IOS firewall suffice as default gateways have firewalls.
Other weak point I am starting to see is the main switch (3750) after the
internet router (2811) that all other routers connect with...
Regards,
Haroon
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti@gmail.com>wrote:
> looks good except 28xx router outside 3750 switch.
> I won't put 28xx router for more than 10 megs.
> 72xx or higher!!
>
> 0.00000000000000002 cents
> Damn inflation so only 000 cents
>
> frog
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Haroon <itguy.pro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello Experts,
>>
>> We are in process of consolidating 3x T1s and one DSL connection at work
>> to
>> only one 10-MB ethernet connection from our ISP. Since it will be a major
>> change in the topology, I am trying to come up with the best design. This
>> is
>> what I got so far:
>>
>> http://www.ccie.pro/NetworkLayout10.jpg
>>
>> We want to saperate each service like video conferencing and VOIP, site to
>> site VPNs on a concentrator, segment the end user network... allow remote
>> users to get in on different public interface whereas right now one router
>> is pretty much doing everything.
>>
>> First, for those who may have gone through similar change, is it a good
>> move? Any pros, cons I should be aware of?
>>
>> How can I improve the layout above?
>>
>> Any suggestions would really be appreciated.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Haroon
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:31 ARST
