From: L Pham (ccie17030@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 12 2008 - 01:02:18 ARST
Glad to hear that ya going somewhere,
I deployed couple of Centralized BB & 3 ACS & +1000 LWAPPs and
thing seem to settle in. Being stable WLAN is the norm for design
until we learn something different.
There is a wireless
http://listserv.educause.edu/cgi-bin/wa.exe?SUBED1=wireless-lan&O=A
that I do frequently read for wireless. Take a look at them if you
have time John.
Loc
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 6:47 PM, john matijevic
<john.matijevic@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Team,
> Had a lengthy meeting today with several partners including ccies. Well all
> said and done, we have decided to use the decentralized approach regarding
> wirless, with putting a controller at remote locations at larger sites, and
> having the WCS talk directly to the controllers at the larger locations.
> Authentication was discussed and was mentioned that Radius and other
> authentication schemes would take up more bandwidth, so for now we will use
> local authentication, and gradually migrate to centralized authentication.
> Another factor into the equation was the wirless voip phones, it was stated
> that since the phone switch as at the site, the concern was that the
> connection would have to go to usa to the controller and then back to emea
> to the phone switch, where as if we had a local controller, would be able to
> direct to the local switch, but there was mention of split tunnelling be
> able to resolve that issue. There was also the discussion of latency with
> going to europe and that was a factor in our environment, becuase we require
> to have the sesion active while roaming, we were concered that if we have
> the controller far away that the session would drop, and that would not be
> acceptable in our environment. Thanks again for all of your feedback, ill
> keep group posted of the progress.....
> Sincerely,
> John
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 8:24 PM, L Pham <ccie17030@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Without any engineering parameters, what are we looking at ?
>> I would think you need to pop in couple of Wism. , 150 or less of
>> LWAPP, and two or so WCS and on the top of it, what kind of Network
>> Design ( sorry I have to use the big words ! ) : I hope you see the
>> picture .
>>
>> For a typical wireless without all there seem to be guess work, IMHO .
>>
>> I would truss a local SE. Cisco use to have the CPOC program but I do
>> not think it's up-to-date with the WCS stuffs.
>>
>>
>> Loc
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 7:19 AM, john matijevic
>> <john.matijevic@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello Team,
>> > I need to know roughtly how much traffic is passed between Cisco AP and
>> > Controller, and how much bandwdith is passed from Controller to WCS
>> > server.
>> > Sincerely,
>> > John
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:30 ARST