Re: PHONE QUESTION WITH CODECS

From: armylegionmedic@aol.com
Date: Mon Nov 10 2008 - 03:10:12 ARST


 Was just a question on if it was capable or not. I was always told you needed a codec to change it into G711 even within the LAN before it went to the phone.

Just Asking and now I know. Thanks!!!

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Mohammed Naviwala <monavy@gmail.com>
To: Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com>
Cc: armylegionmedic@aol.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Sent: Sun, 9 Nov 2008 8:26 pm
Subject: Re: PHONE QUESTION WITH CODECS

but at first place why would you like to ur phones to use 729 within the LAN?

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 12:16 AM, Pavel Bykov <slidersv@gmail.com> wrote:

G.729 is hardware intensive codec (comparatively) but Cisco IP Phones have
encoder/decoder built in.

You need transcoders only if one end cannot talk G.729 (or does not have
enough resources and has to run G.711 which is much less
resource-intensive). e.g. voice gateway

On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 5:50 PM, <armylegionmedic@aol.com> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> ??? I have a question in regards to IP Phones, can we have phones within

> the same site talk G729 to eachother without Transcoders or do phones always
> need to talk G711 to eachother?
>
> TIA,
>
> James
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Pavel Bykov
-------------------------------------------------
Stop the braindumps!
http://www.stopbraindumps.com/

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:30 ARST