From: David Chances (davidchances@yahoo.com)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2008 - 14:56:52 ARST
If you dont like the OT stuff, just do what most people do - Delete it.
--- On Tue, 11/4/08, Joe Rinehart <jjrinehart@hotmail.com> wrote:
> From: Joe Rinehart <jjrinehart@hotmail.com>
> Subject: RE: No politics pls
> To: "'Tien'" <tientien.wang@gmail.com>, "'Administrator'" <Administrator@subfighter.ca>
> Cc: "'Huan Pham'" <pnhuan@yahoo.com>, "'CCIE Lab'" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Date: Tuesday, November 4, 2008, 4:39 PM
> Personally, I think that invalid routes creep into a lot of
> routing tables
> and thus send inaccurate information about how information
> should flow.
> It's a good reason why link-state protocols usually
> prevail over
> distance-vector ones...
>
> Whoever ends up becoming the Designated Router on our
> segment, the fact is
> that we all have to interact with the DR/BDR regardless.
> Those who simply
> refuse to accept that or communicate will find themselves
> in a routing black
> hole...
>
> Just my tax-free eight cents (two cents adjusted for
> inflation)...
>
> Joe Rinehart
> MBA, CCIE #14256, CCNP/DP/VP
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com]
> On Behalf Of Tien
> Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 1:36 PM
> To: Administrator
> Cc: Huan Pham; CCIE Lab
> Subject: Re: No politics pls
>
> Admin,
>
> Is there a way to sort the emails by topic? or this is
> something we have to
> do in our end?
>
> Tien
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 10:03 AM, Administrator
> <Administrator@subfighter.ca>wrote:
>
> > Well said, this crap is getting old. All the fighting
> is like a bunch of
> > kids
> > in a school yard. Keyboard warriars going at it.
> >
> > I thought this place was about Cisco related topics
> ...
> >
> > I have never deleted so much sh!t out of this list in
> my life. Almost
> need
> > a
> > spam filter now.
> >
> > Well said Huan, and Darby too had a good point.
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com on behalf of Huan Pham
> > Sent: Tue 11/4/2008 3:00 PM
> > To: CCIE Lab
> > Subject: No politics pls
> >
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I wake up today with 100 or so emails of Obaba vs
> McCain, and the number
> > keep
> > growing up. Are they new IEEE standards? Or maybe they
> are names of new
> > Proctors?
> >
> > I am not seeking for answers to the above questions,
> but just your little
> > care
> > for the mailing-list, and its members by NOT reply to
> this email, and the
> > other OT topic in discussion.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Huan
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:29 ARST