RE: confused over RIP

From: Kelvin Yeo (kelvinyeo24@yahoo.com.sg)
Date: Mon Nov 03 2008 - 11:33:57 ARST

Yup, with parallel, B would learn A's Lo over both link. Split horizon kick
in, so B will not advertise Lo back the serial it learns, right?

B would not re-advertise back link 1 (Split horizon)
B would not re-advertise back link 2 (Split horizon)

But why didn't it re-advertise the Lo from link 1 out of link 2 and from
link 2 out of link 1? Shouldn't it form a routing loop?

No filter was apply. I found the reason after I recall off-set feature.

-----Original Message-----
From: Marko Milivojevic [mailto:markom@markom.info]
Sent: 03 November 2008 21:17
To: Kelvin Yeo
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: confused over RIP

If the links are parallel, doesn't B learn A's Lo0 address on both links?

Have you tried what happens when you filter the update from A to B on
one of the links, but not the other way round? 

--
Marko
CCIE #18427 (SP)
My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com 
Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.5/1763 - Release Date: 11/2/2008
7:08 PM

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:28 ARST