From: Rick Mur (rick@rickmur.nl)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2008 - 12:10:13 ARST
Perhaps frustration? ;)
Sent from my iPhone
On 2 nov 2008, at 15:00, Scott Morris <smorris@internetworkexpert.com>
wrote:
> Where do you think all the old Appletalk and IPX and DECNet people
> went to?
> :)
>
> Why do you think that IPv6 has so many options that appear very much
> like
> those old protocols?
>
> Evolution? Or reincarnation? Hehhehe...
>
>
> Scott Morris, CCIE4 #4713, JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> CCSI/JNCI-M/JNCI-ER
> Senior CCIE Instructor
>
> smorris@internetworkexpert.com
>
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
> Power corrupts.
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf
> Of Gary
> Duncanson
> Sent: Sunday, November 02, 2008 8:56 AM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: The Martians are back
>
> Im looking at IPv6 BGP today and have incurred a message talking about
> 'Martian next hop'. I thought the martians went away with AppleTalk.
> Can
> anyone shed any light on that one?
>
> Another issue is the glorious frame-relay map command requiring the
> insanely
> long IPv6 address. Is there a rule of thumb to obtain that long
> address
> after
> IPv6 address is configured on the far end? I have tried a few show
> commands
> but nothing helpful comes up. No BGP peering without frame-relay maps
> between the neighbors obviously.
>
> Thanks
> Gary
>
> Gary
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Dec 01 2008 - 08:18:28 ARST