Re: Priority List Usage

From: Dennis Worth (dennis.worth@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Oct 27 2008 - 21:15:30 ARST

That's a 1-up on my side.

Rack1R1(config)#priority-list 1 protocol ipv6 ?
  high
  medium
  normal
  low

Rack1R1(config)#do sh ver | inc IOS
Cisco IOS Software, C2600 Software (C2600-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version
12.4(10a), RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:57 PM, Scott M Vermillion <
scott_ccie_list@it-ag.com> wrote:

> So I guess it would be (mildly) interesting if everyone who posted to say
> that they saw the 'ip' syntax chime in and say whether or not that
> particular image had IPv6 support:
>
>
> R1#sh ver | inc IOS
>
> Cisco IOS Software, 3600 Software (C3640-JS-M), Version 12.4(17), RELEASE
> SOFTWARE (fc1)
>
> R1#sh run | inc ipv6
>
> ipv6 unicast-routing
>
> R1#sh run | inc priority
>
> priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp www
> priority-list 2 protocol ipv6 high
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Hobbs
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2008 12:43 PM
> To: Dennis Worth
> Cc: Jason Madsen; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: Priority List Usage
>
> ah...i have 12.2...that explains it :)
>
> I guess they would be same then...
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Dennis Worth
> <dennis.worth@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > Looks good to me.
> >
> > Rack1R1(config)#priority-list 1 protocol http ?
> > high
> > medium
> > normal
> > low
> >
> > Sh ver
> >
> > System image file is "flash:c2600-adventerprisek9-mz.124-10a.bin"
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Hobbs <deadheadblues@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think the second one is a command is it?
> >>
> >> priority-list 1 protocol http ?
> >> % Unrecognized command
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 25, 2008 at 11:09 PM, Jason Madsen <madsen.jason@gmail.com
> >> >wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi Group,
> >> >
> >> > I was wondering if anyone knows the difference between the following
> >> > priority list examples:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > priority-list 1 protocol ip high tcp 80
> >> >
> >> > and
> >> >
> >> > priority-list 1 protocol http high
> >> >
> >> > I'm a bit tired so I could be missing the obvious here, but the
> config'
> >> > guide and command reference aren't of much help in this matter and the
> >> two
> >> > statements pretty much seem the same to me.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Jason
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >> >
> >> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________________________________
> >> Subscription information may be found at:
> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dennis Worth
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Dennis Worth

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:23 ARST