From: Kavitha N (nkavitha) (nkavitha@cisco.com)
Date: Thu Oct 23 2008 - 11:15:13 ARST
On R3 u have added neighbor cost... due to which it is taking the
preferred path via R4..
neighbor 154.1.0.5 cost 200
neighbor 154.1.0.4 cost 100
________________________________
From: Mahesh Shivaswamy [mailto:maheshs.cisco@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 5:50 PM
To: Kavitha N (nkavitha)
Cc: Shahid Ansari; Hobbs; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP Unable to form Neighbor - Hold time expired
Hi Kavitha,
I am wondering why is 154.1.0.5 reaching through R4, R3 has a direct
mapping statement to R5.
R3#sh run int s1/0
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 270 bytes
!
interface Serial1/0
ip address 154.1.0.3 255.255.255.0
encapsulation frame-relay IETF
ip ospf network point-to-multipoint non-broadcast
frame-relay map ip 154.1.0.4 304
frame-relay map ip 154.1.0.5 305
no frame-relay inverse-arp
frame-relay lmi-type cisco
end
rgds
Mahesh
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 3:34 AM, Kavitha N (nkavitha)
<nkavitha@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi Mahesh
I checked ur setup and noticed that trace from R3 to R5 is two
hops
away..
Hence , the bgp is not working.. So we need to add ebgp multihop
and its
working fine now..
R3#traceroute 154.1.0.5
Type escape sequence to abort.
Tracing the route to 154.1.0.5
1 154.1.0.4 12 msec 16 msec 12 msec
2 154.1.45.5 16 msec * 12 msec
R3#
R3#
Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
154.1.0.4 4 400 317 331 16 0 0
00:41:45
0
154.1.0.5 4 400 133 278 16 0 0
00:41:45
0
Best regards,
Kavitha
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
Behalf Of
Mahesh Shivaswamy
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 11:01 AM
To: Shahid Ansari
Cc: Hobbs; ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: BGP Unable to form Neighbor - Hold time expired
its not an L2 issue,
R3#pi 154.1.0.5
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 154.1.0.5, timeout is 2
seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max =
28/30/32 ms
R3#pi Protocol [ip]:
Target IP address: 154.1.0.5
Repeat count [5]: 500
Datagram size [100]:
Timeout in seconds [2]:
Extended commands [n]:
Sweep range of sizes [n]:
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 500, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 154.1.0.5, timeout is 2
seconds:
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (500/500), round-trip min/avg/max =
28/29/36
ms R3#debu ip bgp BGP debugging is on for address family: IPv4
Unicast
R3#cle R3#clear ip bgp 154.1.0.5 R3# *May 4 12:02:29.791:
BGPNSF state:
154.1.0.5 went from nsf_not_active to nsf_not_active *May 4
12:02:29.791: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from OpenConfirm to Idle *May
4
12:02:29.791: BGP: 154.1.0.5 closing *May 4 12:02:29.791: BGP:
154.1.0.5 went from Idle to Active *May 4 12:02:29.791: BGP:
154.1.0.5
open active delayed 33844ms (35000ms max, 28% jitter)
R3#
*May 4 12:04:04.067: BGP: 154.1.0.5 open active, local address
154.1.0.3 R3# *May 4 12:04:34.067: BGP: 154.1.0.5 open failed:
Connection timed out; remote host not responding, open active
delayed
27215ms (35000ms max, 28%
jitter)
R3#
*May 4 12:04:50.039: BGP: 154.1.0.5 passive open to 154.1.0.3
*May 4
12:04:50.039: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from Active to Idle *May 4
12:04:50.039: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from Idle to Connect *May 4
12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcv message type 1, length (excl.
header) 26
*May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcv OPEN, version 4,
holdtime 180
seconds *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 went from Connect
to
OpenSent *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 sending OPEN,
version 4,
my as: 300, holdtime 180 seconds *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP:
154.1.0.5
rcv OPEN w/ OPTION parameter len: 16 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP:
154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2
(Capability) len 6
*May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has CAPABILITY code:
1, length
4 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has MP_EXT CAP for
afi/safi:
1/1 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ optional
parameter
type 2
(Capability) len 2
*May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has CAPABILITY cod
R3#e: 128, length 0
*May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH
capability(old) for all address-families *May 4 12:04:50.051:
BGP:
154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ optional parameter type 2
(Capability) len 2
*May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has CAPABILITY code:
2, length
0 *May 4 12:04:50.051: BGP: 154.1.0.5 OPEN has ROUTE-REFRESH
capability(new) for all address-families
BGP: 154.1.0.5 rcvd OPEN w/ remote AS 400 *May 4 12:04:50.051:
BGP:
154.1.0.5 went from OpenSent to OpenConfirm *May 4
12:04:50.051: BGP:
154.1.0.5 send message type 1, length (incl.
header) 45
rgds
Mahesh
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 12:05 AM, Shahid Ansari
<shahid1357@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi Mahesh ,
>
> I think there is problem in basic ip connectivity might be due
to bad
> cable on R5.
> can you check sh interface on R5 .Check layer two
encapsulation
> completion .
>
> post us debug ip bgp if L2 is Up .
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Shahid Ansari
> Saudi Arabia(Riyadh)
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 6:07 AM, Mahesh Shivaswamy <
> maheshs.cisco@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> These are real labs, I get the following error after
debugging
>> keepalives
>>
>> R3#
>> *May 4 09:42:59.072: BGP: 154.1.13.1 sending KEEPALIVE (io)
R3# *May
>> 4 09:43:02.332: BGP: 154.1.38.8 received KEEPALIVE, length
(excl.
>> header) 0
>> *May 4 09:43:03.072: BGP: 154.1.38.8 sending KEEPALIVE (io)
R3# *May
>> 4 09:43:22.072: BGP: 154.1.0.4 sending KEEPALIVE (io) *May 4
>> 09:43:22.092: BGP: 154.1.0.4 received KEEPALIVE, length
(excl.
>> header) 0
>> R3#
>> *May 4 09:43:57.948: BGP: 154.1.23.2 sending KEEPALIVE (io)
*May 4
>> 09:43:57.948: BGP: 154.1.13.1 received KEEPALIVE, length
(excl.
>> header) 0
>> *May 4 09:43:57.960: BGP: 154.1.23.2 received KEEPALIVE,
length
(excl.
>> header) 0
>> R3#
>> *May 4 09:43:59.072: BGP: 154.1.13.1 sending KEEPALIVE (io)
R3# *May
>> 4 09:44:02.344: BGP: 154.1.38.8 received KEEPALIVE, length
(excl.
>> header) 0
>> *May 4 09:44:03.072: BGP: 154.1.38.8 sending KEEPALIVE (io)
R3# *May
>> 4 09:44:22.072: BGP: 154.1.0.4 sending KEEPALIVE (io) *May 4
>> 09:44:22.092: BGP: 154.1.0.4 received KEEPALIVE, length
(excl.
>> header) 0
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:03 PM, Hobbs
<deadheadblues@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>
>> > Is this dynamips or real lab? I get this in dynamips
sometimes a
>> > few
>> hours
>> > into a big lab. also try this :
>> >
>> > debug ip bgp keepalive
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 8:42 PM, Mahesh Shivaswamy <
>> > maheshs.cisco@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> I have a FR P-M interface on R3 connecting to R4 & R5, R3
>> >> establishes
>> BGP
>> >> connection to R4 but R3 -> R5 is getting hold time expired
>> >> message, no luck with google,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> R3#sh run | in nei
>> >> neighbor 154.1.0.4 remote-as 400
>> >> neighbor 154.1.0.5 remote-as 400
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> R3#sh ip bgp s | be Neighbor
>> >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>> >> State/PfxRcd
>> >> 154.1.0.4 4 400 155 169 16 0 0
00:34:19
>> >> 0
>> >> 154.1.0.5 4 400 54 134 0 0 0
00:30:33
>> >> OpenConfirm
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> R4#sh run | in nei
>> >> neighbor 154.1.0.3 remote-as 300
>> >>
>> >> R4#sh ip bgp s | be Neighbor
>> >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>> >> State/PfxRcd
>> >> 154.1.0.3 4 300 51 46 16 0 0
00:42:51
>> >> 15
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> R5#sh run | in nei
>> >> bgp log-neighbor-changes
>> >> neighbor 154.1.0.3 remote-as 300
>> >>
>> >> R5#sh ip bgp s | be Neighbor
>> >> Neighbor V AS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ
Up/Down
>> >> State/PfxRcd
>> >> 154.1.0.3 4 300 16 92 0 0 0
00:29:52
>> >> OpenSent
>> >>
>> >> R3#%BGP-3-NOTIFICATION: sent to neighbor 154.1.0.5 4/0
(hold time
>> >> expired) 0
>> >> bytes
>> >>
>> >> any info will be helpful...
>> >>
>> >> rgds
>> >> Mahesh
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:22 ARST