From: stephen skinner (stephenski@gmail.com)
Date: Wed Oct 15 2008 - 01:18:23 ART
In terms of what they actually achieve ..
I think they would both be the same ..
They both will ALLWAYS orginate a route ,
1 will as it will always have a default route ( via your null0 statement )
2.will as it has the "always" statement added.
I think the question would lead you down either path
1.
At the front of your lab there is NO mention about the use of static routes.
Q says ,
create a permenant default route within OSPF ,without using the "default
information-originate always" statement.
2.at the front of your lab there IS an explicit instruction stating "you
must not use static routes"
Q says ,
create a permenant default router within OSPF, do not add any new
Non-dynamic routes to your routing table.
I am no good at writing question , but that sounds pretty good to me :>
HTH
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Nitro Drops
Sent: 14 October 2008 19:33
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: OSPF Default Information-Orignate
Hi All,
Any differences between the followings 2, and under what scenarios do i use
them for OSPF?
1.) default information-originate + ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 null0
2.) default information-originate always
Much appreciated for any kind replies.
Cheers
Nit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:21 ARST