Re: AW: Simple Redistribution Question

From: Darby Weaver (ccie.weaver@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Oct 14 2008 - 11:37:09 ART


Well I suppose it really depends on the context of the question.

1. Mutual Redistribution may or may not be called for.

2. There may be a case where you may want to perform a redistribute
connected in each protocol? Maybe?

3. There may be a scenario where you may wish to ONLY redistribute the
single connected interface so a route-map might be nice.

4. I'd get use to performing a show interface x/x and using the actual
values of the interface versus 1 1 1 1 1, I do understand some workbooks
recommend "the easy way". These days I like to be more specific.

5. There may be a scenario where you may wish to tag your routes and would
need the route-map to do this.

I suppose there may be other scenarios as well, but these come to my mind as
I read your questions and responses.

Always read the whole lab you are presented with, be specific, and DO NOT go
to the game with pre-conceived notions about what you will or will not do.
You might get very surprised.

On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 6:02 AM, <gopal.x.gupta@jpmorgan.com> wrote:

> Agree with you Roger....
> Gops
>
>
>
>
> "Roger RPF" <rpf@bluemail.ch>
> Sent by: nobody@groupstudy.com
> 10/14/2008 02:50 PM
> Please respond to
> "Roger RPF" <rpf@bluemail.ch>
>
>
> To
> "'Reza Toghraee'" <reza@toghraee.com>, "'Cisco certification'"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> cc
>
> Subject
> AW: Simple Redistribution Question
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Well, since you do not enable RIP on that interface, it is not included in
> the RIP process.
> You do a redistribution, so it's kind of external.
>
> As I said below, If you then redistribute RIP into EIGRP (on the same
> router), this loopback will not being redistributed into EIGRP. You would
> also have to do a redistribute connected on EIGRP and include this
> interface.
>
> Someone else in a forum explained me this once with the words: "It has to
> do
> with who "owns" the route. It's a secondary check to prevent loops in
> redistribution on the local device"
>
> regards
>
> Roger
>
>
>
> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Reza Toghraee [mailto:reza@toghraee.com]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2008 10:43
> An: 'Roger RPF'; 'Cisco certification'
> Betreff: RE: Simple Redistribution Question
>
> Roger,
>
> Yes my question is about this LoopBack interface. As this interface is
> redistributed into RIP, Do we have to count this loopback as a part of
> RIP,
> and we must redistribute it as a connected into EIGRP?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Roger RPF [mailto:rpf@bluemail.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:36 PM
> To: 'Reza Toghraee'; 'Cisco certification'
> Subject: AW: Simple Redistribution Question
>
> Yes, you have to, because you only say to redistribute RIP into EIGRP but
> this Loopback is a connected interface.
>
> So then, if you do also a redistribute connected into eigrp and specify a
> route map, you would also have to add the eth0/0 RIP interface into the
> route-map, because this is also a connected interface.
>
> Lab it up, you will see
>
> regards
>
> Roger
>
> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von
> Reza Toghraee
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. Oktober 2008 10:21
> An: 'Cisco certification'
> Betreff: Simple Redistribution Question
>
> Hello
>
>
>
> R1 has 2 Ethernet InterfacesE0/0 and E0/1 and a LoopBack 0
>
>
>
> R1 is running RIP on E0/0
>
> R1 is running EIGRP on E0/1
>
>
>
> Task is asking to advertise Loopback into the RIP without "network"
> command.
> So we do redistribution with a route-map to match the loopback interface.
>
> Next
>
> Task is asking redistribute RIP into EIGRP.
>
> For this task I use "redistribute rip metric 1 1 1 1 1"
>
> the router performs a "show ip route rip" and finds the RIP routes
> and
> redistributes them into EIGRP
>
> the router finds the interfaces which are running RIP (in this case
> E0/0), and redistributes it into EIGRP
>
>
>
> now Do we need to manually redistribute the Loopback interface which is
> already redistributed into RIP in previous question, into the EIGRP?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Reza
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Generally, this communication is for informational purposes only
> and it is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase
> or sale of any financial instrument or as an official confirmation
> of any transaction. In the event you are receiving the offering
> materials attached below related to your interest in hedge funds or
> private equity, this communication may be intended as an offer or
> solicitation for the purchase or sale of such fund(s). All market
> prices, data and other information are not warranted as to
> completeness or accuracy and are subject to change without notice.
> Any comments or statements made herein do not necessarily reflect
> those of JPMorgan Chase & Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates.
>
> This transmission may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential, legally privileged, and/or exempt from disclosure
> under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or
> use of the information contained herein (including any reliance
> thereon) is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. Although this transmission and any
> attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect
> that might affect any computer system into which it is received and
> opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it
> is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by JPMorgan Chase &
> Co., its subsidiaries and affiliates, as applicable, for any loss
> or damage arising in any way from its use. If you received this
> transmission in error, please immediately contact the sender and
> destroy the material in its entirety, whether in electronic or hard
> copy format. Thank you.
> Please refer to http://www.jpmorgan.com/pages/disclosures for
> disclosures relating to UK legal entities.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:20 ARST