From: Luan Nguyen (luan@netcraftsmen.net)
Date: Tue Oct 07 2008 - 21:46:56 ART
That is odd. If memory serves me right, back when Scott was still an IPExpert and had problem with that British voice guy, I couldn't configured the same autonomous-system 1 under both address-family ipv4 vrf CE1 and CE2...but now it lets me :)
By redistribution I meant I have to use this stand alone BGP session to do the redistribution between them. It is not possible to redistribute between themselves directly, yes.
Though I wouldn't call this "best-practice" :P
Luan Nguyen
Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
www.NetCraftsmen.net
-----Original Message-----
From: markom@pangalactic.net [mailto:markom@pangalactic.net] On Behalf Of Marko Milivojevic
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 4:56 PM
To: Luan Nguyen
Cc: Antonio Soares; Cisco certification; comserv@groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Route Leaking Between Different VRFs
> Back to your problem, you need to create a loopback interface so that BGP
> can use as a router-ID on PE and you are good.
Technically speaking, or any other interface in the main routing table.
Regarding your other comment:
> You can't have 2 VRFs under one EIGRP process, hence redistribution.
You can have them, but they will not "see" each other. It is very
unusual in this case to redistribute between them (so much so, that
I'm not even sure if it would be possible). The "best-practice" is
what Anonio did here and run dummy MP-BGP to leak between VRF's.
-- Marko CCIE #18427 (SP) Network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:19 ARST