From: Wes Stevens (wrsteve33-gsccie@yahoo.com)
Date: Fri Oct 03 2008 - 10:21:51 ART
The scenario you talk about was down in my neck of the woods - tx. I guess I did not pay that much attention to it as I know where all the sites were. Did you think not knowing the sites was a disadvantage? I did not see any distance/goe dependent questions, but I may have just internalized it. I also talked to one of the guys from Japan. He also told me that english not being his primary language made the test difficult. I work in a large global team. There has been an number of guide published on how to write in clear english without using regional slang or uncommon words. Not sure what changes could be made to the test to help in this area, but Cisco may need to look at it.
I asked the question specifically and was told they will not reuse any of the scenarios - the next exam will be totally new content.
----- Original Message ----
From: Marko Milivojevic <markom@markom.info>
To: GS CCIE-Lab <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Sent: Friday, October 3, 2008 3:53:51 AM
Subject: Re: CCDE Practical
> Maybe these guys?
>
> CCIE #4699 - Noritaka Tamehisa (5, Routing and Switching, Security,
> Service Provider, Voice, Storage Networking)
> CCIE #7664 - Takanori Matsui (5, Routing and Switching, Service
> Provider, Security, Storage Networking, Voice)
Quite possibly. Unfortunately, I never caught their names. I know that
one of them complained about the test being more a test of his English
reading ability than anything else :-).
Oh, yeah, speaking of that. If one of the scenarios remains for
non-beta period... Brush up on your US geography. Especially location
of obscure little cities in midwest. Apparently, that's what good
networks designers must know ;-)
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Nov 01 2008 - 15:35:19 ARST