Re: EIGRP distribute-list question

From: CCIE unnumbered (ccie.unnumbered@gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 30 2008 - 17:21:05 ART

Next message: Razzaq Shaikh: "Frame-Relay config"
Previous message: Rick Mur: "Re: lab change"
Maybe in reply to: CCIE unnumbered: "EIGRP distribute-list question"
Next in thread: S Malik: "Re: EIGRP distribute-list question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Not very clear to me. I thought both will introduce same routes into EIGRP?
Can some one please explain in more details?

Thanks,
ccie.unnumbered

On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:59 PM, S Malik <ccie.09@gmail.com> wrote:

> 1- filter routes arriving on interface f0/0 from gateway neighbor-R2
>
> 2- Routes permitted by the ACL will enter into the main routing table and
> rest will be filtered out.
>
> Any one please correct if wrong.
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 3:21 PM, CCIE unnumbered <
> ccie.unnumbered@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear GS,
>>
>> What is the difference between the following configurations:
>> (1)
>> router eigrp 1
>> distribute-list gateway neighbor-R2 in FastEthernet 0/0
>> !
>> ip prefix-list neighbor-R2 seq 5 permit 172.16.0.1/32
>>
>> (2)
>> router eigrp 1
>> distribute-list 1 in
>> !
>> access-list 1 permit host 172.16.0.1
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

-- CCIE unnumbered

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

Next message: Razzaq Shaikh: "Frame-Relay config"
Previous message: Rick Mur: "Re: lab change"
Maybe in reply to: CCIE unnumbered: "EIGRP distribute-list question"
Next in thread: S Malik: "Re: EIGRP distribute-list question"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:20 ART