RR-cluster

From: Roger RPF (rpf@bluemail.ch)
Date: Sun Sep 28 2008 - 17:20:05 ART

• Next message: Joe Rinehart: "RE: You guys.."
• Previous message: Andrew Dempsey: "Re: Which Vendor's Workbooks did you use to pass your CCIE"
• Next in thread: Pavel Bykov: "Re: RR-cluster"
• Maybe reply: Pavel Bykov: "Re: RR-cluster"
• Maybe reply: Piotr: "Re: RR-cluster"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi group,

Assume that we have an iBGP cloud with a couple of clients and two
route-reflectors, connecting to each client. Is it correct that in order to
get full redundancy for all "cases" the RR's should also peer together.

I'm asking because I'm currently working on a LAB where the two RR's do not
peer together and to my understanding (and after reading in "Odom"), I was
thinking that the RR's in such a scenario should always have a peering
session together...

regards

Roger

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: Joe Rinehart: "RE: You guys.."
• Previous message: Andrew Dempsey: "Re: Which Vendor's Workbooks did you use to pass your CCIE"
• Next in thread: Pavel Bykov: "Re: RR-cluster"
• Maybe reply: Pavel Bykov: "Re: RR-cluster"
• Maybe reply: Piotr: "Re: RR-cluster"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:20 ART