From: Bogdan Sass (bogdan.sass@catc.ro)
Date: Sat Sep 27 2008 - 07:20:13 ART
Paul Cosgrove wrote:
> Paul Cosgrove wrote:
>>
<snip>
>> I think SW4 is using the older RFC1583 rules. Try:
>> no compatible rfc1583
> Which interface is the RID for R3? Is it on the physical nic between
> R3 and R2? Just checked and even with RFC1583 rules (or at least my
> reading of them) the cost to the forwarding address is still used to
> differentiate between external paths. Based on your diagram, if you
> are using a loopback I would not have expected this to happen.
>
> Paul.
>
The interface used for the RID is the loopback (Lo0) interface on
R3. I was just testing your suggestion (applying "no compatible
rfc1583"), and SW4 still installs both routes towards 158.1.0.0/24.
If you need any additional command output (or configuration
snippets), I would be glad to provide it.
Thank you once again for all your help,
-- Bogdan Sass CCAI,CCNP,CCSP,JNCIA-ER Information Systems Security Professional "Curiosity was framed - ignorance killed the cat"Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:20 ART