From: Ed Man (networkexpert08@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Sep 19 2008 - 10:21:21 ART
Thanks you all.
One more question, should you explicitly configure for "ipv6 address
link-local" for the interface during practical lab?
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Roger RPF <rpf@bluemail.ch> wrote:
> In Ipv6 everything is sourced from link-local address, except virtual links
> in ospf.
> I just configured your proposed setup below and it is not possible to ping
> for example R2 from R3 without the map statements to the link local
> address,
> as Ali said, encapsulation failed. Furthermore, if you use rip on the
> physical interface on R1, you have to disable split horizon in order for R3
> to ping to R2
>
> regards
>
> Roger
>
> -----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von
> Ali
> Mousawi
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. September 2008 22:38
> An: Ed Man
> Cc: GS
> Betreff: Re: IPv6
>
> Hi Ed,
>
> Yeah they will learn the routes but the next hop will be the link local
> address that you cannot reach withount an L2-L3 resolution.
>
> HTH
>
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Ed Man <networkexpert08@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Group
> >
> > When doing with RIPng over Frame Relay,
> >
> > R1
> > |
> > / \
> > / FR \
> > / \
> > | |
> > R2 R3
> >
> >
> > Is it a must to frame map their IPv6 link-local address for RIPng to
> work?
> > Why I ask this is that, without map IPv6 link-local, the routers also can
> > learn the RIPng routes from each other.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Ed.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:18 ART