From: last end (shio2418@hotmail.co.jp)
Date: Wed Sep 17 2008 - 07:01:35 ART
Hi, Marc & Roberto.
Thank you for your help.
Now, I understand that I need more study and progress workbook.
Well, I hope I will understand under processing this work.
Anyway, thank you very much.
Best regards,
sal
> Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 09:39:16 +0200
> From: marc.a.laporte@gmail.com
> To: Roberto.Clavero@telindus.es
> Subject: Re: IEWB Vol2 version4.1 Lab 2 - Task 4.11
> CC: shio2418@hotmail.co.jp; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Except that, unless explicitely mentioned, the CCIE lab is not interested in
> optimal routing, just reachability.
>
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Roberto Clavero Montano <
> Roberto.Clavero@telindus.es> wrote:
>
>> Hi Sal,
>> At the beginning you will be focus only in reach full connectivity, after
>> some labs you will realice that is also important which path will take the
>> traffic to desired network. In other words, when you find distance commands
>> at redistributions solutions is just to modify routing using the
>> shortest/best path instead than leave longest path to be taken.
>> For instance, if you have a direct connection between two routers but at
>> differents ospf's areas, then the traffic will flow throught area 0 crossing
>> more than 5 routers because interarea routes is preffered over interarea,
>> this is undesired behaviour to correct with this kind of actions.
>>
>> I hope this help you,
>>
>> Roberto Clavero
>>
>> CCNP, CCSP, CCSE, SCSA y WLFES
>> Seguretat de Xarxes, Telindus,S.A.U.
>> Parc de Negocis Mas Blau II
>> Avinguda de les Garrigues nB: 38 b 44, planta baixa
>> Edifici Mar Blau
>> El Prat de Llobregat - 08820 Barcelona
>> Mailto:roberto.clavero@telindus.es
>> T +34 93 303 01 59
>> F +34 93 307 26 95
>> Telindus. Change things your way.
>> http://www.telindus.es
>>
>> -----Mensaje original-----
>> De: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] En nombre de last
>> end
>> Enviado el: martes, 16 de septiembre de 2008 19:30
>> Para: ccielab@groupstudy.com
>> Asunto: IEWB Vol2 version4.1 Lab 2 - Task 4.11
>>
>> Hi, group.
>>
>> Thank you for your help by this ML.
>> I really appreciate.
>>
>> Anyway, I can not understand the answer of this task.
>> On SW1, when redistribute rip -> ospf , it is necessary "distance 109" ?
>>
>> Please somebady explain about this.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Sal
>> _________________________________________________________________
>> c c *c c e 0c #c c c (c /f %f ,c .h*0c c e 0c #c &c o< g 8h+ g.1c
>> 'h*?c 9c &c ?c c o<
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/112817927/direct/01/
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:18 ART