Re: Rip Metric

From: Zealist Hammad (zealist@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Sep 07 2008 - 17:43:19 ART

 I also thinks that its a correct behaviour .
Also if its written in Question that they need AD of 3 or 4 after
summarization then u will have to take care of that and give metric one less
for it.

regards
Hammad raza

On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 5:59 PM, CCIE3000 <ccie3000@googlemail.com> wrote:

> Hi Tandou,
>
> Good spot, I've never noticed that!
>
> I don't think it's a bug (without doing a search for a bug) I've just
> configured something with my equipment and I get the same result.
>
> It's going to be one of those things to ask the proctor I should imagine.
>
> FYI, it's the same if you use default-metric command, the summary address
> command adds an extra hop to the metric.
>
> On Sun, Sep 7, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Mohamed Tandou <dtandou@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hello GS,
> > i need someone expertise on this. i advertised OSPF into RIP V2 with a
> > metric of 3. when i do show ip route on the adjacent router i can see the
> > metric of 3 on the route being redistributed into RIP. When i summarize
> the
> > routes being redistributed i see the metric going from 3 to 4 on the
> > summary route. i don't know if this is a bug. My concern is if they ask
> me
> > to advertise a protocol into rip with a metric of 4 and summarize it
> should
> > i summarize it using metric 3 ? Can someone clear this one out?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Tandou
> >
> >
> > Before summary
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > ip address 150.1.11.1 255.255.255.0
> > duplex auto
> > speed auto
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > redistribute ospf 11 metric 3
> > network 150.1.0.0
> > no auto-summary
> > BB1#sh ip route rip
> > 11.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 14 subnets, 2 masks
> > R 11.11.2.2/32 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.1.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.3.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.4.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.5.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.6.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.12.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.14.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.20.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.25.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.30.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.40.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.60.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > R 11.11.100.0/24 [120/3] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:02, Ethernet0
> > BB1#
> >
> >
> ====================================================================================================
> > After summary
> > interface FastEthernet0/0
> > ip address 150.1.11.1 255.255.255.0
> > ip summary-address rip 11.11.0.0 255.255.0.0
> > duplex auto
> > speed auto
> > router rip
> > version 2
> > redistribute ospf 11 metric 3
> > network 150.1.0.0
> > no auto-summary
> > BB1#sh ip route rip
> > 11.0.0.0/16 is subnetted, 1 subnets
> > R 11.11.0.0 [120/4] via 150.1.11.1, 00:00:05, Ethernet0
> > BB1#
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
zealist@gmail.com

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART