From: CCIE3000 (ccie3000@googlemail.com)
Date: Sat Sep 06 2008 - 13:49:58 ART
Hi Narbik,
Thanks for the clarification.
Cheers,
Si.
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> In your configuration you are setting a maximum of 100 prefixes that can be
> redistributed into your OSPF process. you will get your first message when
> 80 percent of that threshold is reached (80 Prefixes) and the second warning
> message when the maximum number is reached (100 Prefixes), but because you
> used the "*warning-only*" keyword at the end of that command, you are NOT
> restricting the number of redistributed prefixes to 100, whereas, if you
> remove the "*warning-only*" you will be restricting the number of
> redistributed prefixes to 100.
>
> On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 6:48 AM, CCIE3000 <ccie3000@googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> I'm just checking that I'm not missing anything and my understanding is
>> correct.
>>
>> Do we achieve the same goal with the following OSPF commands?
>> Anything to be careful with?
>>
>> redistribute maximum-prefix 100 80 warning-only ie when we get to 80% of
>> 100 issue warning
>>
>> redistribute maximum-prefix 80 100 warning-only ie when we get to 100%
>> of 80 issue warning
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Si
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> www.MicronicsTraining
> www.Net-Workbooks.com <http://www.net-workbooks.com/>
> Sr. Technical Instructor
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART