From: Roger RPF (rpf@bluemail.ch)
Date: Sat Sep 06 2008 - 06:13:33 ART
Hi Group,
I have an understanding problem with eigrp-variance-traffic-share. Have a
look at the show output below.
I configured a variance of 4. Why is not the path with the lowest metric
choosen as the best for 2.2.2.2/32? The path over ser0/0.24 has the better
metric, 2297856.
When I configure the command traffic-share min across-interfaces, the path
with the lower metric over ser0/0.24 will be choosen. Is that "work as
excpected" for eigrp when we are using variance?
R4(config-router)#do sir 2.2.2.2
Routing entry for 2.2.2.2/32
Known via "eigrp 24", distance 90, metric 2297856, type internal
Redistributing via eigrp 24
Last update from 143.43.25.2 on Serial0/0.24, 00:03:53 ago
Routing Descriptor Blocks:
143.43.25.2, from 143.43.25.2, 00:03:53 ago, via Serial0/0.24
Route metric is 2297856, traffic share count is 60
Total delay is 25000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1544 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
* 143.43.24.2, from 143.43.24.2, 00:03:53 ago, via FastEthernet0/1.24
Route metric is 7210496, traffic share count is 19
Total delay is 215000 microseconds, minimum bandwidth is 1500 Kbit
Reliability 255/255, minimum MTU 1500 bytes
Loading 1/255, Hops 1
R4(config-router)#do sh ip eigrp top
IP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(24)/ID(4.4.4.4)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,
r - reply Status, s - sia Status
P 2.2.2.2/32, 1 successors, FD is 2297856
via 143.43.25.2 (2297856/128256), Serial0/0.24
via 143.43.24.2 (7210496/128256), FastEthernet0/1.24
P 4.4.4.4/32, 1 successors, FD is 128256
via Connected, Loopback1
P 143.43.24.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 7082496
via Connected, FastEthernet0/1.24
P 143.43.25.0/24, 1 successors, FD is 2169856
via Connected, Serial0/0.24
Many thanks in advance
Roger
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Sat Oct 04 2008 - 09:26:17 ART