From: Joseph Brunner (joe@affirmedsystems.com)
Date: Sun Aug 31 2008 - 00:43:19 ART
>PIM Version 1, together with the Auto-RP feature, can perform the same
>tasks as the PIM Version 2 BSR
That is not correct Raul. Pimv2 with bsr can weight an RP regardless of RP
address. AUTO-RP simply uses the HIGHEST IP.
Only Pimv2 with BSR can make 1.1.1.1 the preferred RP over 2.2.2.2, etc.
-Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of raul
raul
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 11:27 PM
To: paul cosgrove
Cc: muhammad adnan; Peter Stephan; Osamah Shaheen; MANAN;
ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: pim Version 2??
Hi Paul ;
PIM Version 1, together with the Auto-RP feature, can perform the same tasks
as the PIM Version 2 BSR
if i remeber correctly ; Brian mention this ; Pim ver1.5 is auto RP; Pim
Ver2 is BSR
If Question ask for pim version 2 only ; what should we do ?
BSR ?
Thanks
> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 14:40:24 +0100> From: paul.cosgrove@heanet.ie> To:
juvenn@hotmail.com> CC: taurusadnan19@gmail.com; pgstephan@gmail.com;
shaheeno@maaden.com.sa; ccie_rs@rocketmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: pim Version 2??> > Hi Raul,> > Saying "PIMv2 is BSR" is perhaps
a little too simplistic, "BSR is part > of the PIM(v2) Sparse Mode standard"
may be more accurate. > > PIM version 2 relates to the format and useage of
the PIM packets, and > was originally defined as part of RFC2362 (PIM-SM),
later also being > used/extended in RFC3973 for PIM-DM. Both of these were
classed as > experimental RFCs and have since been deprecated. The same pim
version > number was used by both SM & DM, but BSR is obviously not relevant
to > dense mode at all, so was only mentioned in 2362.> > The first real
standard was RFC 4601 (PIM-SM) and BSR has since been > updated by RFC 5059
"BSR Mechanism for PIM". Because DM and PIMv1 are > dead, PIMv2 is often
used to mean the!
current PIM-SM standard (as in > your reply); this defines BSR and also
gives the options of statically > defining and embedding RP info. It does
NOT define AutoRP, so may rule > out use of AutoRP depending on the
question.> > Paul.> > raul raul wrote:> > Pim Ver 2 is BSR ....> Date: Sat,
30 Aug 2008 15:29:47 +0500> From: taurusadnan19@gmail.com> To:
pgstephan@gmail.com> Subject: Re: pim Version 2??> CC:
ShaheenO@maaden.com.sa; ccie_rs@rocketmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com> >
Dear group members:-> can i ask Auto-rp with sparse-dense mode to PIM
VERSION 2> > your reply will help me alot> Regards> > > On Sat, Aug 30, 2008
at 12:43 PM, Peter Stephan <pgstephan@gmail.com> wrote:> > > I would rather
say that PIM v2 means BSR.> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From:
nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> > Osamah
Shaheen> > Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2008 11:01> > To: MANAN;
ccielab@groupstudy.com> > Subject: RE: pim Version 2??> >> > PIM v2 means !
pim sparse and dense mode> > To configure it> >> > Int f0/0> >!
Ip pim
sparse-dense-mode> >> >> > Hope this make sense> >> > Osamah> >> >
-----Original Message-----> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com
[mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of> > MANAN> > Sent:!> 2!> >
008-08-30 09:57> > To: ccielab@groupstudy.com> > Subject: pim Version 2??>
>> > Hello to all group members:-> > i want to know what is PIM version> >
2??> > can any body tell me about pim version 2 how to configure it.> > if
Any Web link please send it to me.> >> > Regards.> >> >> > Blogs and organic
groups at http://www.ccie.net> >> >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:33 ART