RE: AutoRP redundancy

From: Morris, Jason L. (Jasmorris@axcess-financial.com)
Date: Tue Aug 26 2008 - 08:42:49 ART

• Next message: Jonny English: "IEWB lab 13 task 10.1"
• Previous message: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: I have a Cisco serial number, how I could check if this"
• Maybe in reply to: Marc La Porte: "AutoRP redundancy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

I think I'd categorize that as load balancing, though it does provide
some redundancy as well. If that task only asks for redundancy, I'd
configure 2 routers as RP's. The mapping agent will choose the one with
the highest IP and when it fails the mapping agent will start
advertising the 'secondary' out as the RP.

Someone else may be able confirm this as multicast isn't my strong suite
by any means.

Jason Morris

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Marc La Porte
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2008 4:37 AM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: AutoRP redundancy

Hi guys,

Does a solution with AutoRP, AutoRP Listener, and MSDP (no AnycastRP),
whereby I have two (equal-distance) RPs, provide redundancy (automatic
failover)?

Thanks,
Marc

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: Jonny English: "IEWB lab 13 task 10.1"
• Previous message: Farrukh Haroon: "Re: I have a Cisco serial number, how I could check if this"
• Maybe in reply to: Marc La Porte: "AutoRP redundancy"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:32 ART