From: Igor M. (imanassypov@rogers.com)
Date: Mon Aug 25 2008 - 17:38:28 ART
You are dealing with tcp traffic, so if you adjust your acl to look for return traffic to R2 you should be able to apply the policy in the outbound direction on R1
----------------------
I.M., M.Eng. P.Eng.
Network Architect
CI Investments
----------------------
--- On Mon, 8/25/08, Rick Mur <rick.mur@gmail.com> wrote:
From: Rick Mur <rick.mur@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CBWFQ
To: "akyccie" <akyccie@gmail.com>
Cc: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Received: Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:55 PM
Make your access-list more specific for the address or subnet that the
web traffic is coming from and apply it outbound to the outgoing
interface(s)
On 25 aug 2008, at 12:20, akyccie wrote:
> R1 is connected to R2 and R3 over ethernet. I wanted to allocated
> 2mb of
> bandwidth on R1 for the web traffice coming from R2. It's seems
> CBWFQ can't be
> applied on input. So I guess we need to use rate limit here if aksed
> to make
> the change only on R1
>
> R1
> access-list 100 permit ip any any eq 80
> !
> class-map match-all C1
> match access-group 100
> !
> policy-map P1
> class C1
> bandwidth 2000
> !
> R1(config)#int fa0/0
> R1(config-if)#service-policy input P1
> CBWFQ : Can be enabled as an output feature only
> !
> R1(config-if)#service-policy output P1
> R1(config-if)#exit
>
>
> -aky
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:32 ART