From: Mujeeb Sarwar (mujeebsarwar@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 25 2008 - 02:18:23 ART
ip pim dr-priority has nothing to do with election of RP. We can use this
command to make a router favourable to become DR which is responsible for
exchanging join/prune messages.
Regards,
Mujeeb
On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Lloyd Ardoin <Lloyd@thewizkid.biz> wrote:
> I believe it has been mentioned that there are two options available for
> backup RP's with Auto RP
>
> 1) Manipulate the highest IP address on the routers so that they will
> Be primary and secondary of your choosing
>
> 2) Configure a group list that is more specific for the one that
> You want to be the primary and make the group list less
> Specific on the one that you want to be the secondary.
>
> Lloyd V Ardoin
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Igor M.
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 12:00 PM
> To: GAURAV MADAN; akyccie
> Cc: Mujeeb Sarwar; Narbik Kocharians; Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: BSR : Priorities
>
> does this mean that autorp can not have reduntant rp setup?
>
> ----------------------
>
> I.M., M.Eng. P.Eng.
>
> Network Architect
>
> CI Investments
>
> ----------------------
>
> --- On Sun, 8/24/08, akyccie <akyccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: akyccie <akyccie@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: BSR : Priorities
> To: "GAURAV MADAN" <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Mujeeb Sarwar" <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>, "Igor M."
> <imanassypov@rogers.com>, "Narbik Kocharians" <narbikk@gmail.com>,
> "Cisco certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Received: Sunday, August 24, 2008, 12:29 PM
>
> You are right, Only BSR has priority option
>
> By default, the router with the highest interface IP address on a subnet
>
> will be the PIM Designated Router highest IP on the subnet can be
> overridden
> ip pim dr-priority X (default 1, higher preferred)
>
> -aky
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "GAURAV MADAN" <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
> To: "akyccie" <akyccie@gmail.com>
> Cc: "Mujeeb Sarwar" <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>; "Igor
> M."
> <imanassypov@rogers.com>; "Narbik Kocharians"
> <narbikk@gmail.com>; "Cisco
> certification" <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 9:52 PM
> Subject: Re: BSR : Priorities
>
>
> > AUTO-RP has no such option of priority
> > Only BSR has this option
> >
> > Rack1R1(config)#ip pim rp-candidate s0/1/0 ?
> > group-list group-list
> > interval RP candidate advertisement interval
> > priority RP candidate priority
> > <cr>
> >
> > Rack1R1(config)#ip pim send-rp-announce s0/1/0 scope 10 ?
> > group-list Group access-list
> > interval RP announcement interval
> > <cr>
> >
> > HTH
> > Gaurav Madan
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 9:39 PM, akyccie <akyccie@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> So it means in case of Auto-RP, priority command (as defined 80 and
> 90
> in
> >> below example) doesn't paly any role to decide the designate
> >> Primary/backup
> >> router. It will be decided on whoever is having the highest IP
> address.
> >>
> >> I think you can also use "ip pim dr-priority" command in
> interface
> >> configuration mode to set the priority to router you wanted to be
> >> elected
> >> as the designated router (DR)
> >>
> >> -aky
> >>
> >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "GAURAV MADAN"
> >> <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
> >> To: "Mujeeb Sarwar" <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: "Igor M." <imanassypov@rogers.com>; "Narbik
> Kocharians"
> >> <narbikk@gmail.com>; "Cisco certification"
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >> Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 8:39 PM
> >> Subject: Re: BSR : Priorities
> >>
> >>
> >>> Yeah ,, Mujeeb is correct.
> >>>
> >>> If question doesnt permit to use any other interface to announce
> the
> >>> RP still we want a particular router to be elected .. AUTO-RP is
> not
> >>> the solution there .
> >>>
> >>> Yeah if in exam we are permitted to create addition loopback
> >>> interfaces and assign IP address to those of our choice ....
> AUTO-RP
> >>> can be used .
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 7:30 PM, Mujeeb Sarwar
> <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> By using higher ip address for primary. Let say R1 having
> loopback 1
> >>>> with
> >>>> ip address 10.10.10.10 and R2 having loopback 1 with ip
> address
> >>>> 1.1.1.1
> >>>> so in this case R1 will be the primary and R2 will be backup.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>>
> >>>> Mujeeb
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 4:18 PM, Igor M.
> <imanassypov@rogers.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> If you decided to go with Auto-RP, how would you designate
> >>>>> primary/backup
> >>>>> RP pair for a particular group if auto-rp does not carry
> priority?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ----------------------
> >>>>> I.M., M.Eng. P.Eng.
> >>>>> Network Architect
> >>>>> CI Investments
> >>>>> ----------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --- On Sun, 8/24/08, Mujeeb Sarwar
> <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From: Mujeeb Sarwar <mujeebsarwar@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Subject: Re: BSR : Priorities
> >>>>> To: "Narbik Kocharians"
> <narbikk@gmail.com>
> >>>>> Cc: "GAURAV MADAN"
> <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>, "Cisco certification"
> >>>>> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >>>>> Received: Sunday, August 24, 2008, 3:36 AM
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Even in Auto-RP you will get info for all possible RPs on
> mapping
> >>>>> agent,
> >>>>> from which mapping agent will elect the RP and advertise
> to other
> >>>>> routers.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Mujeeb
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 7:43 PM, Narbik Kocharians
> >>>>> <narbikk@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Remember, unlike Auto-RP, with BSR, the BSR router
> does not elect an
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > RP
> >>>>>
> >>>>> for
> >>>>> > you, the BSR creates a list that includes all the RPs
> (RP-Set) and
> >>>>> that is
> >>>>> > advertised to the other routers, and its the routers
> that elect an
> >>>>> > RP
> >>>>> > and
> >>>>> > NOT the BSR.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:43 AM, GAURAV MADAN
> >>>>> <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > >wrote:
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > Any comments on this ?
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>>>> > > From: GAURAV MADAN
> <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:04 PM
> >>>>> > > Subject: BSR : Priorities
> >>>>> > > To: Cisco certification
> <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > HI All
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > My requirement says that R4 should be RP for
> 224.0.0.0/5 .. If R4
> >>>>> > > fails .. R5 should assume role of RP .
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > I did it as follows :
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Rack1R4(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0
> group-list 10 priority
> >>>>> > > >
> >>>>> > > > 80
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Rack1R5(config)# ip pim rp-candidate
> >>>>> loop 0 group-list 10 priority 90
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > At mapping agent .. I see the following :
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Rack1R3#sh ip pim rp mapp
> >>>>> > > PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
> >>>>> > > This system is the Bootstrap Router (v2)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Group(s) 224.0.0.0/5
> >>>>> > > RP 150.1.4.4 (?), v2
> >>>>> > > Info source: 154.1.0.4 (?), via bootstrap,
> priority 80, holdtime
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 150
> >>>>> > > Uptime: 00:03:53, expires: 00:01:32
> >>>>> > > RP 150.1.5.5 (?), v2
> >>>>> > > Info source: 154.1.0.5 (?), via bootstrap,
> priority 90, holdtime
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 150
> >>>>> > > Uptime: 00:03:44, expires: 00:01:41
> >>>>> > > Rack1R3#
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Is it expected that I see both of candidate RPs
> ..
> >>>>> > > My take is that one which is active is only
> shown up .. Please
> >>>>>
> >>>>> correct
> >>>>> > > me if I am wrong in my understanding .
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > > Thnx
> >>>>> > > Gaurav Madan.
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> > >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > --
> >>>>> > Narbik Kocharians
> >>>>> > CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> >>>>> > www.MicronicsTraining
> >>>>> > www.Net-Workbooks.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Sr. Technical Instructor
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>>
> >>>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Blogs and organic groups at
> >>>>> http://www.ccie.net
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:32 ART