Re: BSR : Priorities

From: Narbik Kocharians (narbikk@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Aug 23 2008 - 12:43:21 ART

Remember, unlike Auto-RP, with BSR, the BSR router does not elect an RP for
you, the BSR creates a list that includes all the RPs (RP-Set) and that is
advertised to the other routers, and its the routers that elect an RP and
NOT the BSR.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:43 AM, GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>wrote:

> Any comments on this ?
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
> Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:04 PM
> Subject: BSR : Priorities
> To: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
>
>
> HI All
>
> My requirement says that R4 should be RP for 224.0.0.0/5 .. If R4
> fails .. R5 should assume role of RP .
>
> I did it as follows :
>
> Rack1R4(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0 group-list 10 priority 80
>
> Rack1R5(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0 group-list 10 priority 90
>
> At mapping agent .. I see the following :
>
> Rack1R3#sh ip pim rp mapp
> PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
> This system is the Bootstrap Router (v2)
>
> Group(s) 224.0.0.0/5
> RP 150.1.4.4 (?), v2
> Info source: 154.1.0.4 (?), via bootstrap, priority 80, holdtime 150
> Uptime: 00:03:53, expires: 00:01:32
> RP 150.1.5.5 (?), v2
> Info source: 154.1.0.5 (?), via bootstrap, priority 90, holdtime 150
> Uptime: 00:03:44, expires: 00:01:41
> Rack1R3#
>
> Is it expected that I see both of candidate RPs ..
> My take is that one which is active is only shown up .. Please correct
> me if I am wrong in my understanding .
>
> Thnx
> Gaurav Madan.
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Narbik Kocharians
CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
www.MicronicsTraining
www.Net-Workbooks.com
Sr. Technical Instructor

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:32 ART