From: darth router (darklordrouter@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 22 2008 - 15:44:56 ART
I think you can add service contracts under you consulting company profile.
That makes sense, as resellers have to do this with their clients.
I'm not working for a partner/reseller anyway, so nobody is getting hurt!
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Hoogen <hoogen82@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think that wouldn't be nice. Technically it is possible since you would
> get TAC assistance because your full time company has partner rights with
> Cisco, but when you raise TAC cases from the contract number associated with
> the full time company - for your buisness purposes it would hurt the full
> time company that you work for. The discounts that cisco offers to partners
> work like taking into account the number of sales your company does, no of
> RMA the partner requests and also the number of TAC cases you raised and
> several other factors. And now if you raise TAC cases for your company on
> your full time companies "contract with cisco" that I think is not correct.
>
> -Hoogen
>
> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 11:06 AM, darth router <darklordrouter@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Nice, Thank you!
>>
>> I'm associating with my business, but am working for another company full
>> time. Will I still be able to get the preferential TAC treatment, if I'm
>> not
>> directly associated with the company I"m working for?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Vijay Yadav <vijay@vijayyadav.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Here is the link
>> > http://tools.cisco.com/WWChannels/GETLOG/login.do
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 6:27 PM, Dale Kling <dalek77@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Well, only way I know how anyway. Keep in mind, if you disassociate
>> >> yourself with a partner and have no new partner to go too, you will
>> lose
>> >> all
>> >> IOS download access and other stuff. You get turned into a guest. At
>> >> least
>> >> that's what I was told when I almost did that and then I told them
>> >> nevermind! :)
>> >>
>> >> Dale
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:23 PM, darth router <
>> darklordrouter@gmail.com
>> >> >wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > TAC is whack :) I suppose that's the only way, eh?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:22 AM, Dale Kling <dalek77@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Call Cisco TAC.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:12 PM, darth router <
>> >> darklordrouter@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >>> Anybody know the link, or exactly where to go to do this. It seems
>> >> easy
>> >> >>> to
>> >> >>> add additional access, but not take it away.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Help!
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________________________________
>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Rgds,
>> > Vijay Yadav
>> > CCIE#18760 (R&S)
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:31 ART