From: GAURAV MADAN (gauravmadan1177@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 22 2008 - 10:43:44 ART
Any comments on this ?
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: GAURAV MADAN <gauravmadan1177@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:04 PM
Subject: BSR : Priorities
To: Cisco certification <ccielab@groupstudy.com>
HI All
My requirement says that R4 should be RP for 224.0.0.0/5 .. If R4
fails .. R5 should assume role of RP .
I did it as follows :
Rack1R4(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0 group-list 10 priority 80
Rack1R5(config)# ip pim rp-candidate loop 0 group-list 10 priority 90
At mapping agent .. I see the following :
Rack1R3#sh ip pim rp mapp
PIM Group-to-RP Mappings
This system is the Bootstrap Router (v2)
Group(s) 224.0.0.0/5
RP 150.1.4.4 (?), v2
Info source: 154.1.0.4 (?), via bootstrap, priority 80, holdtime 150
Uptime: 00:03:53, expires: 00:01:32
RP 150.1.5.5 (?), v2
Info source: 154.1.0.5 (?), via bootstrap, priority 90, holdtime 150
Uptime: 00:03:44, expires: 00:01:41
Rack1R3#
Is it expected that I see both of candidate RPs ..
My take is that one which is active is only shown up .. Please correct
me if I am wrong in my understanding .
Thnx
Gaurav Madan.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:31 ART