From: hamid mahmood (hamidnow@gmail.com)
Date: Thu Aug 21 2008 - 10:58:52 ART
the thing is its not only the feature which is concerned.how stable is the
"feature pack" box.
and what about the reponse when i dont have inhouse expertise.
seriously! how much percentage of the feature we utilize.
the box which fits into my network and fulfills what i want and saves my
over night copings with the issues, is the "best box" in the world.
regards
hamid
On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Muhammad Nasim <muhammad.nasim@gmail.com>wrote:
> Yes Mericom reports are Biased it seems to me that Cisco has shares in
> Mericom : )
>
>
> 2008/8/21 George Murage <gmurage@gmail.com>
>
> > Well, the upside of this is that Cisco will wake up and fix all the
> > 'mistakes' that Juniper is capitalizing on. A point in case is the
> > recent release of the ASR 1000 series routers.
> >
> > George
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:19 AM, Abdul <rslab007@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Dude..
> > > Miercom is biased in their testing analysis. I seen their other reports
> > for
> > > other Cisco products, yet, when I bring it into our lab, our results
> > proved
> > > something different.
> > >
> > > Best evaluation, yourself. If you or your team have the expertise and
> > > resources to test the product.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:52 PM, Dale Kling <dalek77@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >> Have anything newer? I'd be very interested in seeing that as my
> > customer
> > >> loves netscreens and I want to push ASAs.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 9:43 PM, GroupStudy @ CrespoNetworks <
> > >> groupstudy@cresponet.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > Really? What about this?
> > >> >
> > >> > http://www.bradreese.com/juniper-firewall-vs-cisco.pdf
> > >> >
> > >> > -----Original Message-----
> > >> > From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On
> Behalf
> > Of
> > >> > Felix Nkansah
> > >> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 6:32 AM
> > >> > To: Dale Kling
> > >> > Cc: Muhammad Nasim; Cisco certification; Cisco certification
> > >> > Subject: Re: Cisco Be aware Juniper Switch coming
> > >> >
> > >> > Hi,
> > >> >
> > >> > I haven't seen any Juniper product that proves to be inferior to its
> > >> Cisco
> > >> > counterpart.
> > >> >
> > >> > They are latecomers who try to correct most mistakes Cisco have made
> > with
> > >> > every one of their new products that come out.
> > >> >
> > >> > The Juniper Netscreen, wan accellerator, routers, switches, etc all
> > rock.
> > >> >
> > >> > As a presales engineer for Cisco products, I usually have to preach
> > >> > "end-to-end" solutions model to my customers when they ask me to
> give
> > >> them
> > >> > reasons to go for Cisco and not a Juniper equivalent.
> > >> >
> > >> > Juniper is a company I respect so much. But for me, I make my bread
> > with
> > >> > Cisco and would continue to love it for the forseable future.
> > >> >
> > >> > Regards,
> > >> >
> > >> > Felix
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> > >>
> > >>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> > >> Subscription information may be found at:
> > >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Muhammad Nasim
> Network Engineer
> Saudi Arabia
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:31 ART