From: Huan Pham (Huan.Pham@peopletelecom.com.au)
Date: Tue Aug 19 2008 - 00:29:39 ART
I think you do not need to think about this too much. You will find out
that the QoS you see in the lab is much simpler than you are worrying
about.
But just in case, this topics keep wondering arround in your head, then
maybe this links can clear it up, and who know, you may get exactly that
in your exam. Good luck!
If you are looking at "something to do with changing the queuing mode of
class-default", then maybe this is what you are refering to.
http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200807/msg01573.html
If you are wondering, why class-default is required, when you do CBWFQ
on sub-interface (no matter if its'Frame or Ethernet which is the case
in the example), this link may has a good explaination
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a
0080114326.shtml
Regards,
huan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
John
Sent: Tuesday, 19 August 2008 12:34 PM
To: ccielab@groupstudy.com
Subject: last minute QoS
Just trying to clear up a last minute QoS kink. I might find this
tommorow, and then times up. I seem to remember that theres a reason to
use class class-default to apply a frame QoS command, and it had
something to do with changing the queuing mode of class-default and then
attatching a policy-map.
I'll probably find it tommorow but any help at this point might mean
the difference between an expensive lunch, and lunch included.
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:31 ART