From: GAURAV MADAN (gauravmadan1177@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Aug 17 2008 - 10:32:57 ART
Hi
Wanna have some clearification on same ..
The link says the following :
In other words, you must configure a hierarchical policy with the
shape command at the parent level. Use the bandwidth command for
CBWFQ, or the priority command for Low Latency Queueing (LLQ) at lower
levels.
Accordingly ; I have :
Policy Map MIGRATE
Class WWW
bandwidth 50 (%)
Class FTP
bandwidth 30 (%)
Class TELNET
bandwidth 5 (%)
-----------
Policy Map MAIN
Class class-default
Average Rate Traffic Shaping
cir 100%
service-policy MIGRATE
-------------
Now I should be able to apply the same to FE sub-interface ,,
Rack1R5(config)#int f0/0.52
Rack1R5(config-subif)#service-policy output MAIN
Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing will be applied only to the
Virtual-Access interfaces associated with an MLP bundle.
It again FAILS :(
Please let me know what am i missing ?
Thnx
Gaurav Madan.
=============================================
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Maxim Kurushkin
<m.kurushkin@orange-ftgroup.ru> wrote:
> Hi,
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk543/tk545/technologies_tech_note09186a0080114326.shtml
>
> WBR,
> Maxim Kurushkin
>
> GAURAV MADAN wrote:
>>
>> Hi All
>>
>> I had cinfigured following class :
>>
>> Rack1R5(config-subif)#do sh class-map SQL
>> Class Map match-all SQL (id 4)
>> Match protocol sqlnet
>> Match packet length min 404 max 404
>> Match protocol custom-01
>>
>> Rack1R5(config-subif)#do sh policy-map SQL
>> Policy Map SQL
>> Class SQL
>> drop
>>
>> Now when I try this to be applied on FE sub-interface ni input
>> direction ( which I feel is correct ) ; I get following error :
>>
>> Rack1R5(config)#int f0/0.5
>> Rack1R5(config-subif)#service-policy input SQL
>> Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing will be applied only to the
>> Virtual-Access interfaces associated with an MLP bundle.
>>
>> Can someone please tell me what am I missing . As per my understanding
>> ; I should be able to do so ..
>>
>> On main interface it doesnt pose any issues and gets aplied easily ..
>> but why not sub-int .. any workarounds ?
>>
>> Thnx in advance
>> Gaurav Madan.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> *******************************************************************************************************
> This message and any attachments (the "message") are confidential and
> intended solely for the addressees. Any unauthorised use or dissemination is
> prohibited.
> Messages are susceptible to alteration. Orange Business Services shall not
> be liable for the message if altered, changed or
> falsified. If you are not the intended addressee of this message, please
> cancel it immediately and inform the sender.
> *******************************************************************************************************
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:31 ART