From: Anant Tamgole (anant.tamgole@gmail.com)
Date: Sun Aug 17 2008 - 05:39:43 ART
Hi,
Has anyone tried the scenario.
Anant
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 7:27 AM, Anant Tamgole <anant.tamgole@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> Any positive results of trying the below scenario.
>
> Anant
>
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Anant Tamgole <anant.tamgole@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sorry friends, I was away.
>>
>> Below is the configuration.
>>
>> Pre-conditions
>> --------------------
>> R1 is Hub and R2,R3 spokes.
>> No subinterfaces are to be used
>> OSPF type NBMA is to be used
>> PIM Join is on R3 e0/1
>> ========================
>>
>> R1 Serial1/0 config
>> -------------------
>> Rack02R1(config-if)#do sh run int s1/0
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 418 bytes
>> !
>> interface Serial1/0
>> ip address 2.2.123.1 255.255.255.0
>> ip pim nbma-mode
>> ip pim sparse-mode
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip ospf priority 255
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> frame-relay map ip 2.2.123.2 102 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ip 2.2.123.3 103 broadcast
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>> end
>>
>> R1 Lo0 config
>> -------------
>> Rack02R1(config-if)#do sh run int lo0
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 83 bytes
>> !
>> interface Loopback0
>> ip address 2.2.1.1 255.255.255.255
>> ip pim sparse-mode
>> end
>> RP Config on R1
>> ---------------
>> Rack02R1#sh run | i rp
>> ip pim send-rp-announce Loopback0 scope 10 interval 10
>> ip pim send-rp-discovery Loopback0 scope 10 interval 10
>>
>> R1 OSPF Config
>> -----------------------
>> Rack02R1(config-if)#do sh run | b r o
>> router ospf 1
>> router-id 2.2.1.1
>> log-adjacency-changes
>> network 2.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
>> neighbor 2.2.123.2
>> neighbor 2.2.123.3
>> ===========================================
>>
>> R2 config
>>
>> Serial 1/0
>> -------------
>> Rack02R2(config-if)#do sh run int s1/0
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 342 bytes
>> !
>> interface Serial1/0
>> ip address 2.2.123.2 255.255.255.0
>> ip pim sparse-mode
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip ospf priority 0
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> frame-relay map ip 2.2.123.1 201 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ip 2.2.123.3 201 broadcast
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>>
>> end
>>
>> R2 OSPF config
>> ---------------
>> Rack02R2(config-if)#do sh run | b r o
>> router ospf 1
>> router-id 2.2.2.2
>> log-adjacency-changes
>> network 2.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
>> =========================================
>>
>> R3 Config
>>
>> Serial 1/0 config
>> ------------------
>> Rack02R3(config-if)#do sh run int s1/0
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 346 bytes
>> !
>> interface Serial1/0
>> ip address 2.2.123.3 255.255.255.0
>> ip pim sparse-mode
>> encapsulation frame-relay
>> ip ospf priority 0
>> serial restart-delay 0
>> frame-relay map ip 2.2.123.2 301 broadcast
>> frame-relay map ip 2.2.123.1 301 broadcast
>> no frame-relay inverse-arp
>> end
>>
>> R3's PIM Join config
>> --------------------
>> Rack02R3(config-if)#do sh run int e0/1
>> Building configuration...
>> Current configuration : 128 bytes
>> !
>> interface Ethernet0/1
>> ip address 150.2.2.1 255.255.255.0
>> ip pim sparse-mode
>> ip igmp join-group 224.2.2.2
>> full-duplex
>> end
>>
>> R3;s OSPF Config
>> -----------------
>> Rack02R3(config-if)#do sh run | b r o
>> router ospf 1
>> router-id 2.2.3.3
>> log-adjacency-changes
>> network 2.2.0.0 0.0.255.255 area 0
>> network 150.2.2.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
>> !
>> ==================================
>> Anant
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 10, 2008 at 12:57 AM, darth router <darklordrouter@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Post your configurations, and it will be easy for us to troubleshoot it.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:48 PM, Anant Tamgole <anant.tamgole@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Also, I have RP mappings in both spokes (without auto-listener commnad
>>>> on
>>>> R1).
>>>>
>>>> Anant
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Aug 9, 2008 at 5:12 AM, Anant Tamgole <anant.tamgole@gmail.com
>>>> >wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > No.
>>>> > R1,2 and 3 are in area 0.
>>>> > On R1, the OIL NULL message comes when we we do debug ip mpacket and
>>>> other
>>>> > drops count increases in sh ip mroute count.
>>>> >
>>>> > Anant
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Igor Manassypov <
>>>> imanassypov@rogers.com
>>>> > > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Are there any other routers involved in ospf? You might be getting
>>>> some
>>>> >> route feedback which violates your rpf check
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> *Anant Tamgole <anant.tamgole@gmail.com>* wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hi,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I have a scenario where
>>>> >> 1. R1 is hub and R2,R3 spokes.
>>>> >> 2. OSPF is running on main interfaces as NBMA mode.
>>>> >> 3. AutoRP is running on Hub R1.
>>>> >> 4. igmp join for 224.1.1.1 is on R3's ethernet.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Problem: Not able to ping 224.1.1 from R1. If I give reapeat count
>>>> 10,
>>>> >> first
>>>> >> ping succeeds but then it stops,
>>>> >> From R1 to R3 ping is ok.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I tried with ip pim nbma mode on Hub and ip pim spt-threshold
>>>> infinity on
>>>> >> R3
>>>> >> , It does not help.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Anant
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Igor M., M.Eng, P.Eng
>>>> >> Network Architect
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:31 ART