From: Hobbs (deadheadblues@gmail.com)
Date: Fri Aug 15 2008 - 01:37:37 ART
i gotta focus on r&s until i've earned the right talk anymore :)
It is actually automatic on a frame-relay multipoint subinterface. The
interface goes down/down when all the remote dlci's go inactive. Here my
notes from a different lab but similar setup. i wasn't at home at the time
so i posted that query to gs...
R1, R3 and R5 connect via full mesh frame-relay, subnet 190.1.135.0/24. Only
R3 has the multipoint interface in this case. The others didn't matter
because I will be shutting those down.
R1 dlci 103 maps to R3 dlci 301
R1 dlci 105 maps to R5 dlci 501
R3 dlci 305 maps to R5 dlci 503
R3(config-if)#int s1/0.3 multipoint
R3(config-subif)# ip address 190.1.135.1 255.255.255.0
R3(config-subif)# frame-relay map ip 190.1.135.1 301 broadcast
R3(config-subif)# frame-relay map ip 190.1.135.5 305 broadcast
R3(config-subif)# no frame-relay inverse-arp
Bring up R5 and R1 again and now we have:
R3#show ip int brief s1/0.3
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Serial1/0.3 190.1.135.1 YES manual up up
Shut down R5 and R3 is still up but look at the debug frame-relay lmi. The
status of PVC 305 is 0x0 which is inactive.
R3#show ip int brief s1/0.3
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Serial1/0.3 190.1.135.1 YES manual up up
*Mar 1 08:27:43.170: Serial1/0(in): Status, myseq 115, pak size 45
*Mar 1 08:27:43.170: RT IE 1, length 1, type 0
*Mar 1 08:27:43.170: KA IE 3, length 2, yourseq 115, myseq 115
*Mar 1 08:27:43.170: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 301, status 0x2 , bw 0
*Mar 1 08:27:43.170: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 302, status 0x0 , bw 0
*Mar 1 08:27:43.170: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 304, status 0x2 , bw 0
*Mar 1 08:27:43.170: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 305, status 0x0 , bw 0
Now let's shut down R1 and take a look at R3 again, notice pvc 301 is now
status 0x0. and the interface is down/down on R3
*Mar 1 08:30:03.170: Serial1/0(in): Status, myseq 129, pak size 45
*Mar 1 08:30:03.170: RT IE 1, length 1, type 0
*Mar 1 08:30:03.170: KA IE 3, length 2, yourseq 129, myseq 129
*Mar 1 08:30:03.170: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 301, status 0x0 , bw 0
*Mar 1 08:30:03.170: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 302, status 0x0 , bw 0
*Mar 1 08:30:03.170: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 304, status 0x2 , bw 0
*Mar 1 08:30:03.174: PVC IE 0x7 , length 0x6 , dlci 305, status 0x0 , bw 0
R3#show ip int brief s1/0.3
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Serial1/0.3 190.1.135.1 YES manual down down
What was driving me crazy was i couldn't get the above behavior to work (on
a different lab). I had removed the maps from subinterface for some reason
hoping to get it go down/down but that didnt work. anyways, hope that helps.
if i am missing something, please let me know
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:15 PM, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>wrote:
> So now that we're past that (and we fight again when we are doing the
> SP/VOICE track in race, right?)
>
>
>
> What was the other way to get int s0/0.1 multipoint to go down without
> dlci's?
>
>
>
> I'm still learning too!
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Hobbs [mailto:deadheadblues@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:42 PM
>
> *To:* Joseph Brunner
> *Cc:* Felix Nkansah; kmoorman@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: which workbook are you using and why
>
>
>
> you got quite a head start, but i'll try to make it a close one :)
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:35 PM, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
> wrote:
>
> I hope you do pass.
>
>
>
> So I can track race your ass!
>
>
>
> JK all the best.
>
>
>
> -Joe
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Hobbs [mailto:deadheadblues@gmail.com]
>
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 11:32 PM
>
> To: Joseph Brunner
> Cc: Felix Nkansah; kmoorman@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: which workbook are you using and why
>
>
>
> nope, no number yet. that's why I'm here. and i'll be trying as hard as I
> can until I get it. and I won't take anything for granted. and I will
> always
> consult multiple sources when in doubt. and i read the doccd everyday. my
> favorite book is titled "Catalyst 3560 Switches, Rel. 12.2(44)SE, January
> 2008" and i have multiple vendor workbooks. and i lab EVERYTHING. and i
> take
> notes and i review them. and when there's an unanswered post that piques my
> curiosity, i'll try to find an answer. and when someone responds with a
> incorrect answer or solution, i'll do my best to find the right one and
> post
> it. and when there's something i just can't get a handle on, i'll search
> the
> archives. and if I can't find it in the archives, i'll query the forum. and
> if no on responds, i'll document it in a little notepad file called "things
> i still need to research.txt". and i'll review those things every so often.
> and i'll repeat the process until i am ready. and i may schedule my lab 6
> months in advance, and i may not.
>
> and when people like you try to crush the spirits of people you feel are
> unworthy of the quest, i wonder what happened to you along the path that
> made you that way
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 9:00 PM, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
> wrote:
>
> Nice one.
>
>
>
> It will hurt a lot more once you actually pass the lab.
>
>
>
> Or was your number on this last message in HTML #FFFFFF and I just missed
> it?
>
>
>
> $^)
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Hobbs [mailto:deadheadblues@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 9:16 PM
> To: Joseph Brunner
>
> Cc: Felix Nkansah; kmoorman@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
>
> Subject: Re: which workbook are you using and why
>
>
>
> Hey Joe, I seem to remember you telling me that EEK was the only way to get
> multipoint interface to fail once the remote DLCI went down. Should I have
> taken your word for it?
>
> Don't worry, I'll make plenty of mistakes too and you can point them it.
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Joseph Brunner <joe@affirmedsystems.com>
> wrote:
>
> That is probably the best answer or post on here in a long time Felix!
>
> Very very well said!
>
> Multiple workbooks! What's next? Removing the 30 day fail period,
> You can just go to rtp for a week and take the lab five times?
>
> ;)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody@groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody@groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Felix Nkansah
> Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2008 8:37 PM
> To: Hobbs
> Cc: kmoorman@gmail.com; ccielab@groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: which workbook are you using and why
>
> Hi Hobbs,
>
> First of all, using a vendor workbook or attending a vendor bootcamp is not
> a prerequisite to taking the lab or passing it. I know of some CCIEs who
> passed their labs through self-study and practice, and not through the use
> of any workbooks (Brian Dennis of IE is a typical example).
>
> One thing you need to understand is that even though we call it a LAB, your
> theory and understanding of networking concepts, technologies and their
> interworking is tested much more than it appears on the outside.
>
> You want to be a good network engineer when going for the lab (to pass it
> and also for your career). Most candidates go for the lab with 'holes' in
> their networking knowledge. Thanks the labs are good at exposing these
> holes.
>
> You could use a million workbooks from a million vendors, and if you still
> dont seal the holes in your networking knowledge, you would still not pass.
>
> Granted, vendor workbooks are supposed to help you do so. If you come to
> think of it, how many different ways could one be tested on frame relay?
> It's finite.
>
> So if you settle on a workbook from a vendor who teaches the technologies
> well and passes you through all the numerous scenarious of FR setups and
> configurations (in about 10+ labs) so that you fully master the concepts,
> do
> you think you've got to need a billion more workbooks before you can pass?
>
> As experiences show, the key to passing the lab is mastering the concepts
> and gaining the hands-on exposure. Any SINGLE good vendor could help you
> achieve that.
>
> Buy time to study and practice, rather than buying thousands of workbooks
> and doing little study. And don't think Reading is the same as Studying. Go
> figure!
>
> Regards,
>
> Felix Nkansah, CCIE
>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:30 ART