Re: Doubt - Network Solution Provider or Infrastructure

From: Mohammed Naviwala (monavy@gmail.com)
Date: Mon Aug 11 2008 - 05:55:48 ART

yeah

kind of overlapping NAT

On 8/11/08, Kgabo Seopa <kgabo.seopa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Monica,
>
> Depending on what kind of infrustructure they are connected on, and what
> kind of routing protocols are being deployed, using static may-to-may NAT
> is
> the best option. But you will need to change the IP address block of both
> companies when going out to the one another.
>
> For e.g. When they come to company A, they might be: 172.16.16.0/16 and
> 10.10.1.0/16 and company changed as well.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Regards,
> Kgabo
>
> On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Monica Belluci <mpls1979@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Dear GS,
> >
> > Suppose I have two companies want to interconnect with each other having
> > same IP subnet blocks on both side
> > 1) Company A - subnet 172.16.1.0/24 ,Subnet 10.1.1.0/16
> > 2) Company B - Subnet 172.16.1.0/24 ,Subnet 10.1.1.0/16
> > On both side We have more than 700 hosts + Servers
> > What is the better way to do communication between them without changing
> Ip
> > addresses ?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Monica Bell
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 

-- 
Best Regards

Mohammed Abdul Razzaq

'A bird sitting on the branch of a tree is not afraid of the branch
breaking; bcoz the bird trusts not the branch but its own wings. BELIEVE IN
URSELF'

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:30 ART