MPLS TE && LDP question

From: Rado Vasilev (decklandv@gmail.com)
Date: Sat Aug 09 2008 - 05:49:45 ART

• Next message: Adam Elghafri: "Re: General Question"
• Previous message: But Nicky: "Re: Sparse Mode Multicast on NBMA with main interfaces at Hub"
• Next in thread: Roman Rodichev: "Re: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Maybe reply: Roman Rodichev: "Re: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Maybe reply: Antonio Soares: "RE: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hi Group,

I'm looking for an answer on this generic MPLS TE question:

When do we have to use ``mpls ip`` on a MPLS TE tunnel interface?

I see from time to time workbook's solutions using it but my solutions
work just fine without it and that's why I'd appreciate if someone is
able to summarize the cases where enabling LDP on a TE interface is
necessary/mandatory.

Thanks,
Rado

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

• Next message: Adam Elghafri: "Re: General Question"
• Previous message: But Nicky: "Re: Sparse Mode Multicast on NBMA with main interfaces at Hub"
• Next in thread: Roman Rodichev: "Re: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Maybe reply: Roman Rodichev: "Re: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Maybe reply: Scott Morris: "RE: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Maybe reply: Antonio Soares: "RE: MPLS TE && LDP question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.4 : Mon Sep 01 2008 - 08:15:29 ART